On Thursday, May 31, 2012 05:10:36 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 5df103be25453280cdcf5807336546cbf833f133
> 2012-05-31_07-02-35
>
> Configured:
> ./configure -opensource -release -confirm-license -prefix $PWD/qtbase
>
> Build error:
>
> + cd qtwebkit && perl Tools/Scripts/build-webkit --qt --r
On Friday, June 01, 2012 10:33:00 AM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2012 09.41.31, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On sexta-feira, 1 de junho de 2012 09.09.19, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > > > Can't locate version.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> >
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 08:56:05 AM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 10 de julho de 2012 03.17.41, jason.mcdon...@nokia.com
wrote:
> > - seems to depends on wrong version of libicui18n.so.42 (should be version
> > 48 for ubuntu 12.04 and 44 for 11.10)
>
> Ugh!
>
> I forgot that the
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 03:59:59 PM ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2012 15.01.42, Jørgen Lind wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I downloaded the package from today(22) and did a
> > configure -prefix $SOMEDIR && make
> >
> > It fails building the mysql plugin.. I also pulled
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 09:51:57 AM ext Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 08/29/2012 09:37 AM, ext Eirik Aavitsland wrote:
> > Binary, on Mac 10.6:
> >
> > Apps:
> > Designer: works, including drag&drop, yay!
> > Assistant: crash on startup, qtwebkit has unresolved symbols.
> > (simon says known is
On Monday, November 05, 2012 09:38:23 AM Iikka Eklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Time stamp: 2012-11-05_08:13_EET
>
> Latest status of installers: all installers except for mac are at origin
> /latest/ folder.
>
> Note, Creator packages still a step behind. Afternoon we should have a
> new set of packa
On Monday, November 05, 2012 12:06:24 PM Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 12:02 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Monday, November 05, 2012 09:38:23 AM Iikka Eklund wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> Time stamp: 2012-11-05_08:13_EET
> >>
&
On Monday, November 05, 2012 09:38:23 AM Iikka Eklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Time stamp: 2012-11-05_08:13_EET
>
> Latest status of installers: all installers except for mac are at origin
> /latest/ folder.
>
> Note, Creator packages still a step behind. Afternoon we should have a
> new set of packa
On Monday, November 05, 2012 12:37:01 PM Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 12:07 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Monday, November 05, 2012 12:06:24 PM Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> >> On 11/05/2012 12:02 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> >>> On Monday, November 05, 2012
On Monday, November 05, 2012 12:22:38 PM Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Monday, November 05, 2012 09:38:23 AM Iikka Eklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Time stamp: 2012-11-05_08:13_EET
> >
> > Latest status of installers: all installers except for mac are at or
On Monday, November 05, 2012 12:02:40 PM Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Monday, November 05, 2012 09:38:23 AM Iikka Eklund wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Time stamp: 2012-11-05_08:13_EET
> >
> > Latest status of installers: all installers except for mac are at or
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 04:28:47 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 03:04:42PM +, Tanilkan Sinan wrote:
> > _Branching_
> > Once rc 2 is out, Sergio will create release branches. If there are
> > changes needed after rc 2, they need to go trough Sergio (who will
> > c
On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 12:15:52 PM Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 08:53 AM, Hausmann Simon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm a bit concerned that we haven't had a successful integration of
> > qt5.bit for the stable branch since December 19th. Perhaps we should
> > branch only after the next
On Tuesday 15. October 2013 11.19.52 Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
> 1) The issue is known for the V4. It currently only builds for THUMB and not
> ARM. I've contacted the developer and waiting for response.
Aaaand there's again a confusion hehe :)
Known is an issue with BB10 on the ARM platform (my _gue
On Tuesday 14. January 2014 06.02.36 Paaso Matti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> All merges are now done, so all changes required for Qt 5.2.1 need
> to be pushed to the 'release' branch from now on.
Great, thanks for the merges.
Could you re-enable the stage button in Gerrit for the stable branches,
please?
On Monday 17. February 2014 07.16.12 Heikkinen Jani wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It seems we cannot start merge from dev branch to stable at the moment
> because there is still some issues to be solved before that:
>
> 1. There seems to be compilation break in dev branch, see
> https://codereview.q
On Wednesday 19. February 2014 14.34.51 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> This is independent of Ossi's proposal and tries to solve a different
> problem.
>
> One of the pain points in this release was the "which sha1 makes it in".
> I'd like to propose defining this part as it hopefully solves quite som
On Wednesday 19. February 2014 16.41.08 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:13:01PM +0100, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19. February 2014 14.34.51 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> > > This is independent of Ossi's proposal and tries to solve a
On Tuesday 25. February 2014 12.49.23 Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 25.02.2014 12:00, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 19:26:29 Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> >> What is problematic is:
> >> - reverse dependencies: we test qtdeclarative when changing qtbase and
> >> the
> >> other way
On Friday 23. May 2014 09.25.32 Turunen Tuukka wrote:
> On 23/05/14 10:40, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
> >Em sex 23 maio 2014, às 07:30:50, Turunen Tuukka escreveu:
> >> We do not know when such new version is released, but it is important to
> >> allow enough time for all Qt users to update their ap
On Sunday 10. August 2014 19.40.40 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
[...]
> anything fundamentally wrong with the idea?
Can't see anything wrong with it - I like it a lot :)
Simon
___
Releasing mailing list
Releasing@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org
Hi,
I totally support Kai's request.
On the upside: The qtlocation build is fixed :)
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Kai Koehne
Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 3:03:18 PM
To: Jani Heikkinen; developm...@qt-project.org
Cc: releasing@qt-project.org
Subje
Hi,
That's an error in the serial bus module and already fixed in 5.8 branch. IMO
not a stopper for the alpha.
Simon
From:jtran...@ics.com
Sent:September 3, 2016 07:08
To:releasing@qt-project.org
Subject:Re: [Releasing] Qt 5.8 alpha packages available
I'm seeing an internal compiler error on
Hmm, the CI interprets these lines. Do you know of any other tool using them?
How about falling back to the tag if the branch cannot be found?
Simon
From: thiago.macie...@intel.com
Sent: December 24, 2016 13:20
To: releasing@qt-project.org
Subject: [Releasing] Remove "branch" lines from .gitm
Hi,
While I agree that this (58133) is a bug, I would not classify it as a bug to
halt the entire release. It's neither
a regression or a particularly common scenario to run into, I would argue. That
said, it's a crash, it needs fixing
and I'll fix it.
Simon
__
Hi,
Slight correction: It's not a regression against 5.7, but it is still a
regression [☹] . I'll fix it ASAP for 5.8.1 and
back-port it also to the 5.6 branch.
Simon
From: Development on
behalf of Simon Hausmann
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2017
Hi,
I'm writing this email because of a recurring problem with our test coverage in
combination with releases of Qt.
Many times in the past we've had the situation where a change was applied to
the CI system that temporarily removed an entire platform, for example in favor
of adding a new on
out the need to follow up that they are added again. I
personally find this very sad from a quality point of view.
Simon
From: Jani Heikkinen
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 2:17:40 PM
To: Simon Hausmann; releasing@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: Avoiding pla
day, January 26, 2017 10:48:56 AM
To: Simon Hausmann; releasing@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: Avoiding platform test coverage regressions
Hi,
>>We continue to accept today's situation of knowingly regressing in platform
>>test coverage for releases of Qt.
I didn't mean that a
Thank you! :)
That concludes the question in my very first email then that it is fine to use
release blocking bugs to track regressions in platform test coverage.
Simon
From: Jani Heikkinen
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 11:01:12 AM
To: Simon Hausmann
Hi,
If my memory serves me right then it's a little magic :)
You select the qqc in the installer and it will show - as version- the latest
Qt version that a build is available for (like even a 5.9 snapshot). Behind the
scenes however it would install binaries of the compiler for all Qt versions
Hi,
Regarding the changelogs for 5.6.3, I have a suggestion:
(1) The changes for 5.6.3 target the 5.9 branch in Gerrit.
(2) Upon approval, Ossi could perhaps force-push them into the 5.9 branch
of the module.
(3) Right afterwards cherry-pick them to 5.6 and also force push them t
32 matches
Mail list logo
