Title: Message
1. I assume, Eugene, that you meant to
write "Following Locke v. Davey, is it
unconstitutional for the government to say that
'religious activity is specifically prohibited'?"
Yes,
I do, sorry about that!
If the answer to that question is
"yes," I don't think it
1. I assume, Eugene, that you meant to write
"Following Locke v. Davey, is it unconstitutional for
the government to say that 'religious activity is specifically
prohibited'?"
If the answer to that question is "yes," I
don't think it's because of the Widmar/Lamb's Chapel
line of cases.
See
http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2004/052004/05242004/1374047,
discussing a public baptism. Here's the explanation for why the people
involved thought the public nature of the baptism was important:
[begin quote]
For Kris Jones, who describes herself as a quiet person, it was a bold