hand, but that also means
there is not much, if any, reasoned analysis available for us to examine.
Roger Severino
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
on behalf of Marty Lederman
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2016 10:40 AM
To: conlawp...@lists.ucla
r Title VII if she is fired for going to
work topless one day? If so, does such a claim defeat a RFRA defense if the
owner, as a matter of faith, does not want to subject customers to seeing
topless women at his or her business (regardless of how they self identify)?
Roger Severino
O
I am curious too. Do you take issue with his theology or do you think his
refusal to defend the law presents an Establishment Clause problem, or
something else?
Roger Severino
On Jul 14, 2016, at 11:09, Michael Worley
mailto:mwor...@byulaw.net>> wrote:
Marty, I, for one, would be c
it be a per se violation in your estimation? If so,
would an equal number of male-only trains make the policy ok even if there is
no demand for them and it would exacerbate the overcrowding problems, thereby
putting more women at risk of abuse?
Thanks,
Roger Severino
On Jun 7, 2016, at 18:18
ate law question raised by Trinity Lutheran Church
Unless I'm missing something, that page doesn't even have cites or links to the
provisions analogous to the Blaine amendment (dealing with schools), let alone
to the provisions akin to those at issue in Missouri, which--unlike the Blain
Try this link. http://www.becketfund.org/blaineamendments/#states
On Apr 30, 2016, at 09:07, Laycock, H Douglas (hdl5c)
mailto:hd...@virginia.edu>> wrote:
I think there's a compilation on the Becket Fund website. There are a lot more
little Blaine Amendments than your list, but they are not a
credibly destructive and
unjustifiable, even if done in a hospital setting, which is not likely the
common practice as I understand it.
-Roger Severino
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Severino
Sent: Mond
boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 6:41 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics; Roger Severino
Cc: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: The impropriety of religious exemptions to child abuse laws
I think that medical opinion has shifted ag
rvant Muslims would seek exemptions to any
such criminal bans.
-Roger Severino
From: vol...@law.ucla.edu
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2009 21:40:52 -0700
Subject: The impropriety of religious exemptions to child abuse laws
I stress again that I’m not sure
hreat in
America for political and constitutional reasons.
-Roger Severino
> From: icl...@law.gwu.edu
> Subject: RE: Impact of same-sex marriage rulings on strict
> scrutinyinreligious exemption cases
> To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:55:
es
not seem to me to
be so far-fetched, especially when one considers the rhetoric of gay rights
leaders like Mr. Knox.
Art, I'm curious to know why you "certainly wouldn't suggest that the state
should withdraw the power to solemnize civil marriages."
Regards,
-Roger Severi
t relationships they will solemnize through
a dual religious and civil ceremony. Ironically, this dual arrangement likely
furthers a stated interest of courts that approve of same-sex marriage--that of
increasing the number of committed couples that enter into civilly-recognized
marriages.
, only certain houses of worship would literally get the
state seal of approval to solemnize marriages while others would not and the
state's choice of winners and losers will turn precisely on each religious
institutions' theology of marriage.-Roger Severino
(Disclaimer: all opinions exp
Boy Scouts
after Dale. See Barnes-Wallace, Evans v. Berkeley, Boy Scouts v. Wyman, among
others.
-Roger Severino
I think Tom is quite right here. Note how the California, Iowa,
Massachusetts, and Vermont cases relied on legislative decisions approving of
gay rights -- antidiscrimination la
14 matches
Mail list logo
