:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Hillel Y. Levin
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 25, 2015 5:53 AM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Anti-discrimination, legislative compromise, and strict
scrutiny
Friends:
As you are likely aware, the LDS church
Academics
Subject: Anti-discrimination, legislative compromise, and strict scrutiny
Friends:
As you are likely aware, the LDS church recently announced support for
legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in
Utah, so long as such legislation included religious
@lists.ucla.edumailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Anti-discrimination, legislative compromise, and strict scrutiny
Strict scrutiny would not be triggered under Smith/Lukumi, principally because
the legislated exemptions are for religious objectors, do not discriminate on
the basis of faith
for Law Academics
Subject: Anti-discrimination, legislative compromise, and strict scrutiny
Friends:
As you are likely aware, the LDS church recently announced support for
legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation in
Utah, so long as such legislation
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of David Cruz
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 10:51 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Anti-discrimination, legislative compromise, and strict
scrutiny
Is it permissible under current law for government actors
AM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: Anti-discrimination, legislative compromise, and strict
scrutiny
Thanks Doug.
Would the same logic apply to beard length regulations on city police
forces? Suppose there was a legislative (or reasoned department) judgment
, February 25, 2015 5:53 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Anti-discrimination, legislative compromise, and strict scrutiny
Friends:
As you are likely aware, the LDS church recently announced support for
legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation
Friends:
As you are likely aware, the LDS church recently announced support for
legislation prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation
in Utah, so long as such legislation included religious accommodations. LDS
leaders were not explicit about the precise contours of the
