From: conlawprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:conlawprof-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marc Stern
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 5:52 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Cc: conlawp...@lists.ucla.edu
Subject: Re: Federal RFRA in Davis-Like Situation?
But the c
la.edu<mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu>
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Conkle, Daniel O.
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 5:22 PM
To: conlawp...@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:conlawp...@lists.ucla.edu>; Law & Religion
issues for Law Academics
Subject: Federal RFRA i
...@lists.ucla.edu; Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Federal RFRA in Davis-Like Situation?
I have a conceptual question that I’ve been trying to get my mind around.
Could the *federal* RFRA be invoked by someone like Kim Davis (whether or not
the state has its own
I have a conceptual question that I’ve been trying to get my mind around.
Could the *federal* RFRA be invoked by someone like Kim Davis (whether or not
the state has its own RFRA), arguing that a federal court order—that is, an
order that is designed to enforce the 14th Amendment—is action of th
