I still dislike Smith. I think the ability of the court to allow play in the
joints under Sherbert/Yoder was superior to both Smith and RFRA especially
given how the court applied RFRA in Hobby Lobby. If the choice is between
Hobby Lobby and any claim of complicity being treated as cognizable
Well said.
Message by Schaerr. Typos by Apple.
On Sep 5, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Alan Reinach wrote:
Eugene Volokh has ably articulated the RFRA analysis. I suggest that a similar
analysis applies under Title VII's requirement that employees be granted
religious accommodations.
Initially, Ms. D
Eugene Volokh has ably articulated the RFRA analysis. I suggest that a similar
analysis applies under Title VII's requirement that employees be granted
religious accommodations.
Initially, Ms. Davis would have to have a sincerely held religious belief that
it would be immoral for her to sign a
