I have taken a quick look at Alito's Religion Clause opinions, and I
have two observations:
1. None of them are about funding issues, so we don't know where
he stands on those (i.e., where would he have been in, for example,
Mitchell v. Helms?). (I think it is very difficult to extrapolate from
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito and Religion
I have taken a quick look at Alito's Religion Clause opinions, and I
have two observations:
1. None of them are about funding issues, so we don't know where
he stands on those (i.e., where would he have been in, for example,
Mitchell
. Chip's correct -- no direct evidence; but I know
where I'd place my wager.
- Original Message -
From: "Lupu" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Law Religion issues for Law Academics"
religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 10:40
AM
Subject: RE: Alito and R
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Stern
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 7:47 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito and Religion
It is not all apparent which way Justice O'Connor would have voted in
the Oliva case, which involved a clash between the right of the speaker
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Brownstein
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:12 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito and Religion
Whether O'Connor would have decided Oliva the same way or not, Alito's
opinion in this case raises some serious
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Brownstein
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:12 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito and Religion
Whether O'Connor would have decided Oliva the same way or not, Alito's
opinion in this case raises some serious
(fax)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Toni M. Massaro
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:59 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito and Religion
I am sure others will climb aboard here, but I think this is not what
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Brownstein
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 12:12 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito and Religion
Whether O'Connor would have decided Oliva the same way or not, Alito's
opinion in this case raises some serious questions
)
202 955-0090 (fax)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Brownstein
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 5:15 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito and Religion
I'm aware that some circuits in some older cases read
for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Alito and Religion
It's not just older cases that have done this. The 2nd Circuit, in an
opinion by Judge Calabresi, did so less than 2 weeks ago. Peck ex rel.
Peck v. Baldwinsville Central School Dist. Judge Calabresi recognized
that the rule of viewpoint
This is one of the most vexing free speech and, often, free exercise issues that I've had to deal with. I don't think that calling the activity curricular solves the problem, either, since extremes at either end of that spectrum also defy application of a general rule. If a child is placed in
analysis. Maybe
the same analysis could apply to students.
Alan Brownstein
UC Davis
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roman Storzer
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005
4:55 PM
To: Law
Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Alito and Religion
at the Court
would apply Sherbert to it?
Eugene
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, October 31,
2005 8:03 AMTo: religionlaw@lists.ucla.eduSubject: Re:
Alito and Religion
Okay, I'll bit
13 matches
Mail list logo
