Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Is First Amendment viewpoint-discriminatory against antigay
speech
I too found that comment a little cryptic. If Michael meant to be
doctrinal rather than just attitudinally predictive, my guess would be
that he didn't mean that a different First Amendment
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Newsom Michael
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:29 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Is First Amendment viewpoint-discriminatory
against antigay speech
David has it right: a compelling governmental interest
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 2:56 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Is First Amendment viewpoint-discriminatory against antigay
speech
Wow, that really is a remarkable First Amendment position: The
government
, November 02, 2007 12:41 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Is First Amendment viewpoint-discriminatory
against antigay speech
No, not remarkable.
Viewpoint neutrality is a chimera and an illusion, in my
opinion. I do agree that the Court is not likely to agree
I too found that comment a little cryptic. If Michael meant to be
doctrinal rather than just attitudinally predictive, my guess would be
that he didn't mean that a different First Amendment rule would apply,
but that those decisions might somehow justify a conclusion that there's
a compelling
