:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 5:34 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: The Bedford pool exemption--a collection of reactions
Well, I'm sure glad I asked about t
Law Academics
Subject: Re: The Bedford pool exemption--a collection of reactions
A few more thoughts:
1. Are there any women participating on this listserv? It seems remarkable
that we have talking about this gender based policy for days and (unless I
missed something, and please forgive me if t
& Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: The Bedford pool exemption--a collection of reactions
Well, I'm sure glad I asked about this case -- this has been a wonderfully
provocative and informative thread, thanks!
A few reactions and further questions:
1. I'll start with the
w-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2016 11:18 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: The Bedford pool exemption--a collection of reactions
A few more thoughts:
1. Are there any women participating on this listserv? It seems remarkable
th
Some national attention now --
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/3259421f36124a34be17b68654a7bf4e/no-men-allowed-women-only-pool-hours-draw-complaints-nyc
.
Note the references to Seattle and a Minneapolis suburb, and the ambiguous
position of city wide authorities in NYC (relevant in light of Kiryas
A few more thoughts:
1. Are there any women participating on this listserv? It seems
remarkable that we have talking about this gender based policy for days and
(unless I missed something, and please forgive me if that is the case) all
the participants are men.
2. The Kiryas Joel problem is no
Well, I'm sure glad I asked about this case -- this has been a wonderfully
provocative and informative thread, thanks!
A few reactions and further questions:
1. I'll start with the Establishment Clause. First, let's assume for the
sake of argument (and to clarify our analysis) a counterfactual,
