er, in numerous
respects.
- Original Message -
From:
Douglas
Laycock
To: Law & Religion issues for Law
Academics
Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 3:28
PM
Subject: RE: Use of Religion to Achieve
Secular Ends
These are serious objections, and they may wel
rdless of the consequences.
Alan Brownstein
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Douglas Laycock
Sent: Sat 5/6/2006 12:28 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Use of Religion to Achieve Secular Ends
These are serious objections, and th
ED]Subject: Re: Use of Religion to Achieve Secular
Ends
But Doug, assume that the state prison decides that
"religion works for some people," and therefore creates a program such as the
one you describe: It establishes within the prison a funded
series of voluntary rehab programs, som
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty
LedermanSent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 12:37 PMTo: Law
& Religion issues for Law AcademicsSubject: Re: Use of Religion
to Achieve Secular Ends
In the comments section to his post (http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2006/05/religion_in
Law AcademicsSubject: Re: Use of Religion to
Achieve Secular Ends
In the comments section to his post (http://prawfsblawg.blogs.com/prawfsblawg/2006/05/religion_in_pri_1.html#comments), in
response to my assertion that the state cannot and must not act on the
conclusion that "religious transformation [a
quot;
<religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>; "Law
& Religion issues for Law Academics" <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>; "Law
& Religion issues for Law Academics" <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: Use of Religion to Achieve
Treating this as a constitutional issue, the answer is that government may
not "take, and act on (in non-coercive ways, of course, and > consistent with
the freedom of conscience), the view that "religious transformation
[and] faith" are good (when freely > embraced)," because this is an
i
It's unclear how the
proposition that theological transformation and faith are good when embraced
either freely or through coercion is a theological proposition or is only a
theological proposition. As a theological proposition it is, in my view, rather
uninteresting since one will a
ced" in the theologically relevant sense after coercion).
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, May 5, 2006 9:30 pm
Subject: Use of Religion to Achieve Secular Ends
> The other day I posted about the unconstitutionality of the BOP
> religious-rehabilitation
12:31 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics; Law & Religion issues for
Law Academics; Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Use of Religion to Achieve Secular Ends
The other day I posted about the unconstitutionality of the BOP
religious-rehabilitation funding p
; "Law
& Religion issues for Law Academics"
Sent: Friday, May 05, 2006 2:30 PM
Subject: Use of Religion to Achieve Secular Ends
The other day I posted about the unconstitutionality of the BOP
religious-rehabilitation funding program. See
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2006/04/blatant
The other day I posted about the unconstitutionality of the BOP
religious-rehabilitation funding program. See
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2006/04/blatantly-unconstitutional-federal.html.
FYI, the Freedom from Religion Foundation has now sued to challenge the program:
http://ffrf.org/legal/gonza
12 matches
Mail list logo