This is a very interesting question given that the ADL and the
National Review, which is apparently a recent 501(c)(3) - see
http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2015/03/national-review-goes-nonprofit-204795
and published an anti-Trump manifesto, among others have come under
scrutiny for their
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/03/24/ga-parents-offended-by-the-far-east-religion-of-yoga-get-namaste-banned-from-school/
--
Prof. Steven D. Jamar
Assoc. Dir. of International Programs
Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice
The 501(c)(3) rules are really clear: a tax-exempt organization cannot endorse
or oppose (which, I assume, is what you mean by "nonendorsement") a candidate
for office. That clearly includes an editorial in a tax-exempt magazine.
And it's actually not enough to be circumspect, essentially
I wonder whether my colleagues at the Post may have been
imprecise with the word "banned." As best I can tell, the school is simply
deciding what to include as part of its own class:
Among the elements of the program that will be eliminated: the Sanskrit
greeting "Namaste,"
