government accommodation of speech or religion.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: "Volokh, Eugene" <vol...@law.ucla.edu>
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "refle
u<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
I much appreciate the background on how airports make their
money, but I don’t think this matters for Establishment Clause purposes
A blog reader asked me about this, and I thought I’d pose the
question to the list. Orlando Airport is apparently spending $250,000 to build
a “reflection room” where Muslim travelers can more conveniently pray,
especially given the expansion of the airline Emirates at the
w@lists.ucla.edu>>
Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:18 AM
To: "Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
(religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>)"
<religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Muslim-focused &
gionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Date: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:20 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
<religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airpo
ober 28, 2015 12:41 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
#yiv3162872023 #yiv3162872023 -- _filtered #yiv3162872023
{font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv3162872023
{font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}#yiv
20 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
Is this any different than creating chapels or worship/reflection spaces on a
state university campus, in a county hospital, or on a militar
Is this any different than creating chapels or worship/reflection spaces on
a state university campus, in a county hospital, or on a military base?
What holds these examples (including the airport) together is the desire to
accommodate the worship needs of patrons/participants who have no ready
according to ostensibly neutral criteria.
Alan
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ira Lupu
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:21 AM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room&qu
d other denominational chapels that might be
provided?
sandy
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Butterfield
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:58 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused &qu
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Ed Darrell
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 2:31 PM
To: Alan E Brownstein; Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
Alan, there's a difference between public space and the space people pay r
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Justin Butterfield
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 2:35 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
The former, but not that rooms are provided for a wide range of expressive
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
I would hope that no court would hold that allocating access to public property
or allocating public funds on the basis of majority approval or votes would
constitute ne
...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
> religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Justin Butterfield
> *Sent:* Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:58 PM
> *To:* Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
> *Subject:* Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
>
>
>
>
Law Academics
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
Again I note, airport terminals are not buildings that state pays for nor pays
to maintain (though title often falls to a governmental entity if the facility
is abandoned). I just don't think our usual "wha
: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
I agree that there's a possible accommodation approach that would allow the
reflection room as well.
Setting aside accommodation, the Sixth Circuit rests pretty strongly on
neutrality as the guiding principle in holding that government fund
m: Alan E Brownstein <aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu>
To: Ed Darrell <edarr...@sbcglobal.net>; Law & Religion issues for Law
Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in ai
nlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
I’m not sure how all of these free speech cases the Sixth Circuit cites apply
to the government funding of a chapel. Is the argument that the creation of
rooms i
e: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 4:35 PM
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics
<religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu<mailto:religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>>
Subject: Re: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in airport
The former, but not that rooms are provided for a wide range of expre
19 matches
Mail list logo
