Upon slower reading of the Court's opinion, I think Eugene is right here. Question (or bafflement) withdrawn, and apologies for taking up bandwidth.
David B. Cruz Professor of Law University of Southern California Gould School of Law 699 Exposition Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071 U.S.A. -----Original Message----- From: religionlaw-bounces+dcruz=law.usc....@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-bounces+dcruz=law.usc....@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Volokh, Eugene Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 9:16 AM To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: Law.com - 3rd Circuit Rejects Muslim Cop's Bid to WearReligiousScarf Is the rule really against wearing religious attire? I couldn't quickly find Police Department Directive 78 -- the relevant rule -- online, but as I understand it, it sets forth a specific uniform, and all deviations from the uniform are prohibited, whether they are religious or otherwise. I doubt, for instance, that the department would allow the wearing of political buttons, or ethnic symbols, or just the officer's favorite hat. Or am I missing something? Eugene > -----Original Message----- > From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu > [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of David Cruz > Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:24 AM > To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics > Subject: RE: Law.com - 3rd Circuit Rejects Muslim Cop's Bid > to Wear ReligiousScarf > > I don't understand why counsel would not have argued starting > with the complaint that a rule against wearing *religious* > symbols or attire was not a "neutral law of general > applicability" and thus should receive strict scrutiny under > the federal Free Exercise Clause. > > David B. Cruz > Professor of Law > University of Southern California Gould School of Law > 699 Exposition Blvd. > Los Angeles, CA 90089-0071 > U.S.A. > > -----Original Message----- > From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu > [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Joel Sogol > Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 2:05 AM > To: Religionlaw > Subject: Law.com - 3rd Circuit Rejects Muslim Cop's Bid to > Wear Religious Scarf > > A Muslim woman who works as a Philadelphia police officer has > lost her court battle to wear a religious head scarf on the > job now that the 3rd U.S. > Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that forcing the > department to accommodate her would compromise the city's > interest in maintaining "religious neutrality" in its police force. > > http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202429736190 > _______________________________________________ > To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To > subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see > http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw > > Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be > viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read > messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; > and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the > messages to others. > _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others. _______________________________________________ To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/religionlaw Please note that messages sent to this large list cannot be viewed as private. Anyone can subscribe to the list and read messages that are posted; people can read the Web archives; and list members can (rightly or wrongly) forward the messages to others.
