Joel's post raises an excellent analogy. Say that a child tells his
classmates that he thinks Christianity is a myth, and that belief in
religion is illogical -- eminently legitimate and important arguments,
but ones that will naturally offend his classmates. (Note that the
statement could arise
In a message dated 11/6/05 3:39:04 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Under current doctrine, I take it that the school must tolerate such
speech unless it's actually likely to start a fight.
You'd take it wrong in the Eleventh Circuit. School officials do not need Tinker's