RE: State RFRA and nonreligious groups thathaveconscientiousobjections to antidiscrimination laws

2006-03-20 Thread Newsom Michael
for Law Academics Subject: RE: State RFRA and nonreligious groups thathaveconscientiousobjections to antidiscrimination laws Religions may have special and unique features for legal purposes. But it doesn't follow that one of those features is an entitlement to get a government benefit

Re: State RFRA and nonreligious groups thathaveconscientiousobjections to antidiscrimination laws

2006-03-02 Thread Ed Darrell
By the way, I think it's not entirely accurate to say Boy Scouts discriminate on sexual orientation of members. Under BSA Youth Protection guidelines, it would be inappropriate for a leader to make such inquiry of youth members, especially 7-year-old Tiger Cubs. The issues have been litigated for

RE: State RFRA and nonreligious groups thathaveconscientiousobjections to antidiscrimination laws

2006-03-02 Thread Newsom Michael
. -Original Message- From: Volokh, Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 7:17 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: RE: State RFRA and nonreligious groups thathaveconscientiousobjections to antidiscrimination laws 1) The question

RE: State RFRA and nonreligious groups thathaveconscientiousobjections to antidiscrimination laws

2006-03-01 Thread Andrew Wyatt
And not only are they unfazed by the question What about a group that claimed that boys and girls should not participate together in the group's activities for fear of 'erotic' attractions between boys and girls? -- they are indeed such a group; they are, after all, the *Boy* Scouts, and