--- AJCONGRESS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IF SO MANY PEOPLE WANT THIS CLUB, WHT IS THERE NOT
SOMEONE ELSE TO STAFF
IT?
I'm sure there is someone else. But that does not
justify restricting the First Amendment rights of the
teacher to participate (not to mention the children's
the First
Dear
Charles,
I don't
dispute anything that you say -- but it really is nearly impossible to get there
from the language and intent of the statute, which was to protect religious
students' right to meet on equal terms with other groupsrather than to
impose substantive limits on school
--- AJCONGRESS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is not children who truly want to go to
the club.It is children
who do not,or would not,but for the perceived
advantage of being with Mrs.
Smith, who is trading on one role (public scholl
teacher ) to enhave
another:(Christian club
In reading the last round of posts on this topic (and we are starting
to just repeat arguments, which probably means it's time to quit,
without fighting for the last word), I'm beginning to think that the
problem bothering those who support the school system in this
conflict is whether the teacher
My son, who is a law student at another school, told
me that one of his professor's has a fun way of
describing the reasonable observer test under the EC.
He says just ask WWSD. What Would Sandra Do!
Cute! --Rick
=
Rick Duncan
Welpton Professor of Law
University of Nebraska College of Law
