can you read google this morning ?
Nice to see a 'ham' feel to it :)
Rick
Yeah, it took me a while to figure out the text wasn't on TWO lines; you had to
read it left to right.
I don't think it was necessarily ham-related; more like the creator of the code.
Bob M.
==
--- On Mon, 4/27/09, Rick Szajkowski va3r...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Rick Szajkowski
Morse's Birthday. Needs _.._. ._. to make the thread repeater related.
Don W5DK
Its Samuael Morse birthday.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Bob M. msf5kg...@... wrote:
Yeah, it took me a while to figure out the text wasn't on TWO lines; you had
to read it left to right.
I don't think it was necessarily ham-related; more like the creator of the
code.
That would be the design I was thinking of, You would only build half
of the enclosure in a 1x4 configuration. To convert to BpBr you would
only have one coupling loop per cavity and on the ground leg of the
loop you would have a high quality variable capacitor or a N or BNC
connector to come out
We built a duplexer back in the late '70s using sections cut from the refueling
boom from a KC-135 tanker. After cutting the six sections to length, the
inside of the top end had to be machined to be able to insert a cap with the
center tube and coupling loops inside with a tight fit. The
I see a good deal of complaining and anecdotes in this thread, but no
solutions. Does anyone have a company/agent/plan that is good?
73
Dan
--
Dan Simmons
KC2BEZ
President North Country Amateur Radio Club W2LCA
http://www.geocities.com/w2lca
www.hamradioinsurance.com
After doing a little research on eHam reviews (and consulting with a good
friend who is an independent insurance agent), the Lake Amateur Radio
Association (www.k4fc.org) went with the $5K insurance plan. I also got the
same plan personally.
Doug
K4AC
From:
I probably missed some of this thread.
If you're looking just to insure the equipment, I've been very happy
with ARRL. They replaced our antenna and feedline a few years back and
paid the cost of having the repeater repaired. They've also replaced 2
other repeaters over the years.
Mike
Anyone have a set of surplus Mastr II icoms available ?
Dan,
I see the same thing. I think that more specifics are needed. Home
equipment/tower/antenna or like what I'm looking for
liability insurance for the site/tower owner
John
Dan KC2BEZ wrote:
I see a good deal of complaining and anecdotes in this thread, but no
solutions. Does anyone
I have some 155 range 5c and ec icoms available if they will work in 444 range.
Nt sure if they are interchangeable. Maybe someone else can answer that.
Dean.
--- On Mon, 4/27/09, Phil Hebert n3...@comcast.net wrote:
From: Phil Hebert n3...@comcast.net
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] 444.850 Tx
As a wireless installer with a little RF knowledge, I can tell you *nothing*
is a bigger piece of crap than anything Netgear sells. I'd also guess this
WISP also loses a lot of gear based on what you've mentioned so far. I'd
have to suggest to them the following:
ACisco makes nice
Does anyone have a source for the following connectors:
L45NI need at least four
L45ZOne will do
These type of connectors fit the old style 7/8 inch heliax. Contact me at:
drwoolwea...@yahoo.com
Thanks de David
Dan,
It's not clear whether you are wanting to insure your equipment against
theft or damage, or want to insure your group against liability. Please
clearly state which you want information about.
73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
I didn't have any problem with the strobe noise until the internet gear
desensed my receiver. It is not being retransmitted. They are powering their
tower top equipment by sending the DC on the CAT5 Cable. Wouldn't such a long
run greatly attenuate the power available to the tower top
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Jacob Suter jsu...@... wrote:
It also shouldn't be causing a
problem/reaction with the WISP gear (it may be causing damage to it!) so I'd
definitely find out what is going is going on with the strobe.
Good luck!
Jacob Suter
WISP gear
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, Laryn Lohman wrote:
WISP gear interference may not be obvious until you look for it. RF
from an unwanted source on its receive channel *will* desense any
receiver, FM or not.
At one of our remote receive sites we ended up with Canopy equipment
within 20 ft. of our
18 matches
Mail list logo
