Ok, I'll re-word that to desense, not isolation
Kerry
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs...
kerry wrote
If you are not using a pll exciter, it's hard to get the isolation..
Kerry
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Custer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Wacom WP-641, correction on its specs
kerry wrote:
If you are not using a pll exciter, it's hard to get the isolation
Kerry
The type of exciter used has nothing to do with how much isolation the
duplexer exhibits.
Kevin Custer
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
I am Getting only 83 db Isolation usning My 641's..
funny thing. I cannot get it to work with my MastrII repeater. But it
works great with the Spectrum..
Kevin Custer wrote:
I own several sets of Wacom 641's, so I'll correct Eric's figures. The
Wacom 641 is a 4 cavity BpBr duplexer using 8
Neal Newman wrote:
I am Getting only 83 db Isolation usning My 641's..
funny thing. I cannot get it to work with my MastrII repeater. But it
works great with the Spectrum..
The obvious question is, is it tuned properly? The Wacom 641 is very
simple to get close with nothing more than a
I fought a duplexer tuning problem for several hours, then noticed the
repeater transmitter was spurious. Mission Impossible.
Ssb
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an
I own several sets of Wacom 641's, so I'll correct Eric's figures. The
Wacom 641 is a 4 cavity BpBr duplexer using 8 inch cans.
Eric Lemmon wrote:
A 2m repeater on 147.090/147.690, with a 50 watt transmitter and a 0.35 uV
receiver generally requires about 88 dB of isolation for no desense.
7 matches
Mail list logo
