a TEE ???

ok when you want both antennas to XMIT & Recieve at the same time a Tee is 
designed for that purpose, but for repeater that will not fly !

My sugguestion the ARRL Handbook and some primer on repeaters, this stuff is 
on the Extra Exam BTW



Mark Holman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ab8ru.org     Life Member  A.R.R.L.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Q" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Converting Use of Duplexer from 
SingleAntenna to Split Antenna?


> You would gain much more isolation by separating them vertically. Side
> by side would also mess up the pattern. Not familiar with that
> duplexer,but if it has a Tee at the antenna port,simply remove it and
> connect the two antennas where the Tee was. This >may< throw the tuning
> off some but is worth a try. Why do you feel the need to split the
> antennas? Having desense problems?   73,Lee,N3APP
>
> k3phl wrote:
>
>>Hello all,
>>
>>  I am considering running split antennas at my 220 MHz site in
>>Philadelphia as a test to increase sensitivity and troubleshoot a
>>duplex noise issue.  The machine is currently a modifed Motorola
>>Micor using a TX/RX 4 can duplexer, DCI bandpass filter in the RX
>>leg, and a Comet Super 22 (220) base antenna.
>>
>>  I am considering running separate Super 22 antennas 12 feet apart
>>horizontally.  One feedline run will go from the transmitter direct
>>to the TX antenna.  The other feedline run will run from the receiver
>>to RX port of duplexer, common port of duplexer to 220 bandpass
>>filter and then to the RX antenna.  The TX port of the duplexer will
>>remain unconnected.
>>
>>  I expect the duplexer to act as a 2 can deep notch, eliminating the
>>transmitter from the receiver with the TX port open.  I assume the TX
>>rejection in the receiver line should improve and the resulting RX
>>sensitivity should improve since the transmitter has been reduced to
>>a strong near field instead of RF on the same line.  Is this the
>>correct theory of using a duplexer in a split antenna site and if so,
>>should the TX port be left unconnected or capped with a 50 ohm load?
>>
>>Thanks in advance,
>>
>>Steve
>>K3PHL
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to