Re: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting- OT but worth the thought

2005-11-21 Thread Mark A. Holman
Broadcasting is switching to LED lighting check with a CPBE at any station. if your concern for going over the 200 foot tower height and check CFR 47 part 17. Mark Holman SBE CRO IT student Doug Zastrow wrote: Hello All, In return for free tower space our ham club baby

[Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting

2005-11-20 Thread Doug Zastrow
Hello All, In return for free tower space our ham club baby sitsa 360 ft. guyedtower. Looking for anyone with real-world experience with Flash Technology FH-324 red/white flash tower obstruction lighting. In the 18 month period following new installation all three red 'beacons' have

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting

2005-11-20 Thread Eric Lemmon
Doug, I hope your Ham club did not accept any responsibility for the operation or maintenance of the tower lighting, because some of the most severe fines and penalties are for failure to have the tower properly lighted. Fines of $10,000 per day have been levied for lighting violations, so you

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting

2005-11-20 Thread Steve Bosshard \(NU5D\)
] On Behalf Of Doug Zastrow Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 10:42 AM To: Repeater-Builder@Yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting Hello All, In return for free tower space our ham club baby sitsa 360 ft. guyedtower. Looking for anyone with real-world

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting

2005-11-20 Thread Paul Finch
:42 AMTo: Repeater-Builder@Yahoogroups.comSubject: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting Hello All, In return for free tower space our ham club baby sitsa 360 ft. guyedtower. Looking for anyone with real-world experience with Flash Technology FH-324 red/white flash

OT, long and boring-WAS RE: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting

2005-11-20 Thread Paul Finch
Of Eric Lemmon Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 11:28 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting Doug, I hope your Ham club did not accept any responsibility for the operation or maintenance of the tower lighting, because some of the most

Re: OT, long and boring-WAS RE: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting

2005-11-20 Thread Kevin Custer
Paul Finch wrote: I will add a few points here... big snip. Kevin, sorry for the OT post but felt it was important. Posts like these are not to be considered OT, as repeaters wouldn't be on the air without towers But, thanks for the consideration. kuggie Yahoo! Groups Links

RE: OT, long and boring-WAS RE: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting

2005-11-20 Thread Paul Finch
-WAS RE: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting Paul Finch wrote: I will add a few points here... big snip. Kevin, sorry for the OT post but felt it was important. Posts like these are not to be considered OT, as repeaters wouldn't be on the air without towers But, thanks

Re: OT, long and boring-WAS RE: [Repeater-Builder] Flash Technology Tower Lighting

2005-11-20 Thread mch
Make sure you file comments if that happens and relay your experience with the poor reliability. I'm sure the FAA would prefer a reliable system over an OEM one. Joe M. Paul Finch wrote: One other thing, the tower lighting industry (TWR and Flash Tech) are trying to petition the FAA and FCC