RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-13 Thread Paul Finch
Right on Brother! Paul -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Miller Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:53 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-13 Thread Paul Finch
PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 1:29 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story At 1/12/2006 19:01, you wrote: Nate, That is the only way I can see to find the problem, send someone up the tower

RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-12 Thread Paul Finch
Texas -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Maire-Radios Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 11:20 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story what state

Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-12 Thread Nate Duehr
We're also hunting a dead carrier on the repeater input of our 147.225 system in Denver. Total pain in the ***. The only antenna that appears to hear it reliably is the one that's up on the tower, on the mountain... of course. Nothing at ground level has been able to pick it up yet, and it's

RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-12 Thread Paul Finch
inch 2 Meter DB cavity. Paul -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nate Duehr Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 6:19 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story We're

Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-12 Thread Charles Miller
Were not a State, We are a country, The Republic of Texas. - Original Message - From: Paul Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:50 AM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story Texas

RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-12 Thread Jeff DePolo WN3A
@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story We're also hunting a dead carrier on the repeater input of our 147.225 system in Denver. Total pain in the ***. The only antenna that appears to hear it reliably is the one that's up on the tower

RE: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-12 Thread no6b
At 1/12/2006 19:01, you wrote: Nate, That is the only way I can see to find the problem, send someone up the tower with a HT with a S meter, cavity and Yagi. This interference I am fighting is on 815 MHz so I have the ability to send a 4 inch cavity. Can you imagine the look on the tower guys

[Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-11 Thread Paul Finch
Hello again, I am working on a weird interference problem right now for that matter, it's been going on for two weeks or so. I have a customer that I maintain a 800 MHz LTR Trunk system for. One of the receivers is getting a stable dead carrier signal 2.5 KHz high in frequency. It is

Re: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story

2006-01-11 Thread Maire-Radios
what state are you in? - Original Message - From: Paul Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 12:13 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] OT - NOW NOT SO funny interference story Hello again, I am working on a weird interference