.
Could it be someone retrofitted this RC-96 with this mod ??
Ron Rogers
WW8RR
-Original Message-
From: Tedd Doda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: RC-96 EEPROM
On Mon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: RC-96 EEPROM
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:38:08 -0400, Rogers, Ron wrote:
A 6264 is an 8K X 8 CMOS Static RAM..when you unplug it, it loses all data
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:38:08 -0400, Rogers, Ron wrote:
A 6264 is an 8K X 8 CMOS Static RAM..when you unplug it, it loses all data.
The 2864 is an 8K X 8 CMOS EEPROM...does not lose data when unplugged.
Hi Ron:
Well that would make sense! My only question arises
is how can the base data
Hi Tedd,
Tedd Doda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I belong to the one run by Chris,
but all the messages are moderated
by him, so until he releases them,
they don't hit the reflector :(
It's a bit of a pain, he should consider adding
additional moderators.
That's what I thought. I've
Hi Ted,
There are at least two ACC Repeater Controller groups on
Yahoo. One is the more busier of the two, run by Chris.
Yes, the EEprom contains operational parameters and must
be loaded. I possibly have the 5.2 data for the acc 96,
but I do have data for earlier versions. I have a few 96
Hi Skipp:
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:57:55 -, skipp025 wrote:
There are at least two ACC Repeater Controller groups on
Yahoo. One is the more busier of the two, run by Chris.
I belong to the one run by Chris, but all the messages
are moderated by him, so until he releases them, they don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
