:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
Careful! That channelization map only shows the CENTER frequency of the
direct-sequence spread-spectrum channel you're using. I believe Mr.
Reese is incorrect in his statement that channels 7 and 8 are in the ham
band.
Each channel
Kevin Custer wrote:
Bob Dengler wrote:
...and if internet isn't available at the site, how about using 802.11b or
a to bring it in? I've yet with play with that stuff, but it sounds to me
like a pair of gain antennas at each end could get you a couple of miles to
where you would have
Kevin Custer wrote:
Bob Dengler wrote:
...and if internet isn't available at the site, how about using 802.11b or
a to bring it in? I've yet with play with that stuff, but it sounds to me
like a pair of gain antennas at each end could get you a couple of miles to
where you would have
I am interested as well... is that maybe the USGS TOPO package that is
marketed by National Geographic? The cross-section at the bottom of
graphic 3 looks vaguely familiar...
mike
At 11:43 AM 12/10/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Some images:
Jim B. wrote:
Cool stuff, Kevin! I didn't know 802.11b could be told to go to freqs in
the ham band, or that it could use a ham call as an ID. Sounds like
something good to play with.
I can see using this for things like Echolink/IRLP, etc. Or a
non-internet WLAN system...
BTW, the 3D pic
Kevin Custer wrote:
Jim B. wrote:
Cool stuff, Kevin! I didn't know 802.11b could be told to go to freqs in
the ham band, or that it could use a ham call as an ID. Sounds like
something good to play with.
I can see using this for things like Echolink/IRLP, etc. Or a
non-internet WLAN
Mike Perryman wrote:
I am interested as well... is that maybe the USGS TOPO package that is
marketed by National Geographic? The cross-section at the bottom of
graphic 3 looks vaguely familiar...
mike
DeLorme Topo USA 4.0
Kevin
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the
Message-
From: Kevin Custer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
Mike Perryman wrote:
I am interested as well... is that maybe the USGS TOPO package that is
marketed
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:26:21 -0500, Kevin Custer wrote:
however feel free to discuss the
technical nature of the subject in any detail here.
Hi Kevin:
A bunch of us were thinking about setting up a Ham
radio only network here near Kitchener. Can you give
any details on the reprogramming of
I have a 6.65 mile non-line-of-site path to bring internet access to
my
home from the center of town where our T1 line exists. I use 802.11b
(2.4 gHz) with larger grids (about 24 dB gain) on each end. There are
different cards available these days that have better receiver
sensitivities
At 07:54 PM 12/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:
A bunch of us were thinking about setting up a Ham
radio only network here near Kitchener. Can you give
any details on the reprogramming of the hardware?
---I'm curious about this myself. I'm installing a Linux machine at my
site soon and this would be
At 08:10 PM 12/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:
The hardware is Canadian based out of BC, and their
website is:
https://tranzeo.com/index.php?section_id=10
---Thanks for the info, Tedd! Let me know what you find out. Although I'm
thinking this may be a bit of an overkill for my situation but I'm not
GHz
Channels 1 through 8 fall in the Amateur band of 2390 to 2450 GHz.
73
Richard D. Reese
http://www.wa8dbw.ifip.com
- Original Message -
From: Tedd Doda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:00:12 -0800, Ken Arck wrote:
Hopefully, Kevin's suggestion is Linux usable as well.
Hi Ken:
I'm the feed point of a commercial 802.11 network, and
using their hardware makes things look very easy.
The hardware is Canadian based out of BC, and their
website is:
:15 PM CST
From: Richard D. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
There are 11 channels used as the standard for 802.11b/g.
They are:
Chan 1 2412 GHz
Chan 2 2417 GHz
Chan 3 2422 GHz
Chan 4 2427
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 20:24:17 -0500, Richard D. Reese wrote:
Channels 1 through 8 fall in the Amateur band of 2390 to 2450 GHz.
Thanks for clearing that up Richard. I was under
the impression that we had some frequencies that were
not available for the general public.
Tedd Doda, VE3TJD
Lazer
- Original Message -
From: Tedd Doda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 20:24:17 -0500, Richard D. Reese wrote:
Channels 1 through 8 fall in the Amateur
... winter is coming and think
of all the extra time now that yard work is winding down!
mike
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Custer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 6:26 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
Mike Perryman wrote:
I had no idea there was this kind of interest in this subject!
Maybe I should take this time to promote this list?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wireless-Internet/
Kevin Custer
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
Another ... list ?
Groan ...
Neil - WA6KLA
Kevin Custer wrote:
Mike Perryman wrote:
I had no idea there was this kind of interest in this subject!
Maybe I should take this time to promote this list?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wireless-Internet/
Kevin Custer
: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:26:21 -0500, Kevin Custer wrote:
however feel free to discuss the
technical nature of the subject in any detail here.
Hi Kevin:
A bunch of us were thinking about setting up a Ham
: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:26:21 -0500, Kevin Custer wrote:
however feel free to discuss the
technical nature of the subject in any detail here.
Hi Kevin:
A bunch of us were thinking about setting up a Ham
radio only network here
Mike Perryman wrote:
I have heard some rumblings of TCP/IP experimentation in the ham bands, but
no details as of yet. It is a subject I am very interested in. There would
be numerous uses for that concept as it relates to our hobby. Hopefully
someone can shed a little light on the subject as
Has anyone tried a bi-directional amplifier like this
one on ebay;
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=61815item=5736479461rd=1ssPageName=WDVW
Check the ARRL site for more information on ham use;
http://www.arrl.org/hsmm/project.html
And check this link for a cool waveguide
Bob Dengler wrote:
...and if internet isn't available at the site, how about using 802.11b or
a to bring it in? I've yet with play with that stuff, but it sounds to me
like a pair of gain antennas at each end could get you a couple of miles to
where you would have wired internet access.
25 matches
Mail list logo
