Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ACSSB - FM History

2009-11-17 Thread Joe
1970 protocol in upstate New York was to use 146.94 as a simplex frequency and only use the 94 repeater if you could not talk simplex. You were looked down upon if you used the repeater and were in simplex range. 73, Joe, K1ike GE PreProg on 94 simplex and 34/94 wd8chl wrote: > lenaw12 wrote

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ACSSB - FM History

2009-11-16 Thread MCH
I thought 34/76 was the standard. (146.340 in, and 146.760 out) Joe M. wd8chl wrote: > lenaw12 wrote: >> 146.94 was the defacto standard repeater >> channel that was perfect for the traveling ham because every city had >> a repeater on that pair. > > That was after it was national simplex freque

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ACSSB - FM History

2009-11-16 Thread wd8chl
lenaw12 wrote: > 146.94 was the defacto standard repeater > channel that was perfect for the traveling ham because every city had > a repeater on that pair. That was after it was national simplex frequency ;c)))

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ACSSB - FM History

2009-11-14 Thread George Henry
I have a mid-50's vintage Motorola trunk-mount (all tube, vibrator supply) in the garage with 34/94 in it still works, too! George, KA3HSW / WQGJ413 - Original Message - From: "lenaw12" To: Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 9:26 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder]

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ACSSB - FM History

2009-11-14 Thread Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis
er 14, 2009 10:26 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: ACSSB - FM History > The history of the "right coast" FM development is pretty accurately > described on page 59 of this document: > > http://www.docstoc.com/docs/11595271/The-History-of-Ham-Radio > > I haven't quo

[Repeater-Builder] Re: ACSSB - FM History

2009-11-14 Thread lenaw12
The history of the "right coast" FM development is pretty accurately described on page 59 of this document: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/11595271/The-History-of-Ham-Radio I haven't quoted it for copyright reasons but it gives a sane take to all the madness of the time. 146.94 was the defacto st