Mainly because the BNC connectors seem flimsy in my opinion (I've
had two break on two separate HT's over the past few years) and from
reading up whats posted on the net everyone seems to agree that
steering clear of PL-259 and BNC connectors in repeaters is a good idea.
My first and
-
From: Alexander N Tubonjic kg4...@yahoo.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:15 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax Interconnect (Inside Repeater)
Mainly because the BNC connectors seem flimsy in my opinion (I've
had two break on two separate HT's
...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Chuck Kelsey
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:21 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax Interconnect (Inside Repeater)
You want to steer away from junk connectors, and there are a lot of them out
there. BNC's get used
@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:44 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax Interconnect (Inside Repeater)
I agree. In my military days, we used a lot of BNC connectors into the 400
MHz range with no problems.
Stick with Amphenol or a another good mil-spec brand
kg4ogn%40yahoo.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 12:15 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Coax Interconnect (Inside Repeater)
Mainly because the BNC connectors seem flimsy in my opinion (I've
had two break on two
At 09:27 AM 1/21/2009, Eric Vincent wrote:
Better matching, less loss, handle power, robust and perfect for RG-214.
---Better matching? Both N and BNC are constant
impedance. Power? Not a concern for receivers.
RG-214? BNCs work quite nicely with it.
Ken
I am wanting to swap out the BNC receiver connector to
an N connector on my Kenwood TKR-750 2 meter repeater.
Why..? It's a horrible idea and a real potential for trouble.
Would there be some major advantage (we seem to be overlooking)
over the factory installed rx BNC connector?
s.
7 matches
Mail list logo
