At 12/13/2005 08:37 AM, you wrote:
> > "Paul Finch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Skipp,
> > I may be able to help. I honestly don't think mounting
> > that style antenna close to metal was your main problem
> > unless there is some loose metal already in the area of
> > the antenna.
>
>Most all
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:21 AM
> Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB201 warning
>
>
> > Skipp,
> >
> > Can you explain why the DB201 is prone to intermod? Why is it any
more
> > prone than a DB410, DB224 or an
> "Paul Finch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Skipp,
> I may be able to help. I honestly don't think mounting
> that style antenna close to metal was your main problem
> unless there is some loose metal already in the area of
> the antenna.
Most all of the mentioned problematic UHF Antennas I
ight.
In my opinion, very good advice to check these.
Regards,
Doug Zastrow, WBØUPJ
- Original Message -
From:
Paul Finch
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 6:32
PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB201
warning
Ski
, December 12, 2005 6:12 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB201 warning
The reason the DB201 is prone to IM in duplex service is that corrosion
shows up in the connection where the element fits inside a cast aluminum
adapter on top of the insulator. Over
skipp025
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 11:01 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB201 warning
No Paul, I can't really. There is no obvious reason why
the UHF antenna is prone to IMD generation.
Through the years I installed well over 50 into Metro San
F
-
From: "Paul Finch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 8:21 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB201 warning
> Skipp,
>
> Can you explain why the DB201 is prone to intermod? Why is it any more
> prone than a DB410, DB224 or any other fol
MAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of skipp025
> Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 1:51 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB201 warning
>
>
> I've got to post this information regardless of opinions.
>
> The UHF DB-201 UHF 450-470 antenna is
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of skipp025
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 1:51 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: DB201 warning
I've got to post this information regardless of opinions.
The UHF DB-201 UHF 450-470 antenna is a well known IMD
generator when p
Are you sure on the Sinclair model number? I had always heard that the
SRL-222 and SRL224 were dogs.
Chuck
skipp025 wrote:
> I've got to post this information regardless of opinions.
>
>
> There are a number of antenna models, which have
> proven to be real trouble makers. The UHF DB-201
I've got to post this information regardless of opinions.
The UHF DB-201 UHF 450-470 antenna is a well known IMD
generator when placed anywhere semi close to other metal
objects.
I fought many a gremlin sourced back to the UHF DB
antenna. (no problems to report with the vhf or low
band vers
11 matches
Mail list logo
