[Repeater-Builder] Re: Good bye!

2006-04-24 Thread jeffwkinc
content removed by moderator Moderation note: How about dropping this. The person being refered to is not in the group anymore. So you are just taking up bandwidth and not accomplishing anything. Let us get back to the topic at hand...repeaters. 73, Jon KD5SFA end Moderation note: Regards...

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Good bye!

2006-04-23 Thread Harold Farrenkopf
There must have been a large metallic wall or screen between his 2 antennas for his repeater to work without degradation with 25' horizontal separation. Or else he had an amazing radio that transmitted over 50dB less sideband noise and a front end made like a crystal filter. His loss, not ours.

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Good bye!

2006-04-23 Thread no6b
At 4/23/2006 17:58, you wrote: There must have been a large metallic wall or screen between his 2 antennas for his repeater to work without degradation with 25' horizontal separation. Or else he had an amazing radio that transmitted over 50dB less sideband noise and a front end made like a crystal

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Good bye!

2006-04-23 Thread n . mckie
Like Vince said ... Tx power = 100uW / receiver sens 1V ... Neil - WA6KLA Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Good bye! Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:30:38 -0700 At 4/23/2006 17:58, you wrote: There must

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Good bye!

2006-04-23 Thread Lloyd Mitchell
My momma once said then take your happy azz on we dont care... Mitch --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Teton Amateur Radio Repeater Association (TARRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have only belonged to this group for a short time. I'm sure all of you will be glad to know that as of

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Good bye!

2006-04-23 Thread Harold Farrenkopf
... Tx power = 100uW / receiver sens 1V ... Neil - WA6KLA Original Message From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Good bye! Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2006 19:30:38 -0700 At 4/23/2006 17:58, you wrote: There must have been