Both are great receivers (and repeater base units) overall. I like the MSR preformance in busy places, ie mountain top repeater sites. The newer generation receiver appears to have a better third order intercept preformance.
Both work just fine and are good choices. cheers skipp025 atyahoo.com > Ted Maczulat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We are upgrading a repeater site and have a choice of using Micor or MSR2000 > equipment. > The MSR is newer but that does not necessarily mean better. > > Both are factory built VHF repeaters with factory built UHF basestations as > link radios. > Both are in pristine condition, and in the correct bandsplit with original > PL boards for use in the ham bands. > We will be using an RLC4 controller to replace the stock controller boards. > > The site could be considered a high RF environment with many other service > on the mountain top. > > My question to the group is which would be better to use. > > I would be interested to hear opinions one way or the other. > > Thank You > Ted, VE7TFM > Technical Director > Arrowsmith Amateur Radio Club > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
