RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-23 Thread Steve Helton
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Coy Hilton Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 00:24 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR Eric, Wasn't the MX500 at one time, Motorolas Cadilac HT? Did they have the same conector problems? We had only one in our entire

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-23 Thread Maire-Radios
on hot standby. - Original Message - From: Steve Helton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 3:45 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR The reason these radios are now coming on the market is that the Federal law on medical

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-23 Thread Riley Frazee
our service would need to update... soon than we had planned thanks Riley. (Asst. EMS Director) From: Steve Helton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 15:45:41

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-23 Thread Jim B.
Steve Helton wrote: The reason these radios are now coming on the market is that the Federal law on medical privacy (HIPPA) is requiring the encryption of any medical information between the field units and the hospitals. Squads that transmit patient info in the clear face severe penalties.

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-23 Thread KA9QJG
The Privacy issues is a real valid point, But here in the Chicago Metro area Every Ambulance still use 155.340 in the Clear to relay personal info to the Local Hospital while transporting the patient. I Have a friend who a few yrs back did Convert one of the units to a Low power Emergency 440

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-23 Thread Steve Helton
it if there is such a law our service would need to update... soon than we had planned thanks Riley. (Asst. EMS Director) From: Steve Helton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR Date: Mon, 23 May

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-23 Thread Maire-Radios
- From: Steve Helton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 4:22 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR I am in SW Ohio and everyone here in my part of the country has abandoned MEDCOM based on what I stated before. The hospitals in my area

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-22 Thread Coy Hilton
I had the same Idea. It is actually built from a MX350 or MX500 Tx and Rx boards the duplexer is built for 10 mhz split and the 46x. MHz medical band. The Duplexer won't tune down. It's a neat toy Mine went down in my Car to the bottom of the retention pond. I dodged a kid on a bicycle, and my

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-22 Thread Coy Hilton
Eric, Wasn't the MX500 at one time, Motorolas Cadilac HT? Did they have the same conector problems? We had only one in our entire Fire dept. It seemed to have few but weard problems. That goes back 25 years. 73 AC0Y --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Eric Lemmon [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Motorola APCOR

2005-05-22 Thread Eric Lemmon
Coy, I've never seen an MX500, but I remember using the MX300R for an Air Force project back in the mid-80's. This was a ruggedized model that was encased in a black rubber jacket. Although somewhat reliable, they were pretty expensive- about $3,800 per copy with DVP encryption. The problems I