Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-13 Thread Richard Reese
-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, November 12, 2007 9:55 PM Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160 Do you own a bearcat scanner? I can't remember the IF freq for them right off hand. 10.8 or 10.7? Maybe even 11. something. I had one that was receiving

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-12 Thread MikeDeWaele
Do you own a bearcat scanner? I can't remember the IF freq for them right off hand. 10.8 or 10.7? Maybe even 11. something. I had one that was receiving a channel in the 150's range and every time it stopped on that channel it would lock up the 2 meter freq for the duration that it was stopped

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-11 Thread David Murman
Yep. - Original Message - From: Jay Urish To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 3:10 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160 Do you mean for FiOS? If so, thats not a modem.. It's an OPTICAL NETWORK

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-11 Thread John Barrett
] On Behalf Of lpcoates Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 9:22 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160 Thanks to everyone who replied. On a related note, I found something at home that probably answered my question. Lately I noticed

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-10 Thread George Sintchak
Some years back, when we installed the repeater (also 146.760/160) in a new building, we noticed a weak buzz...buzz signal ~once a second, very near the input frequrncy. After much searching, it turned out to be the smoke alarm heads within the building, all hard wired into their own AC line.

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-10 Thread skipp025
Hi Ken, ATV activity... both from Amateur Operations and of course the import Wireless Video TV Extenders. Dont' forget the wonderful RF-ID tags. We're starting to get bombed by spread spectrum devices that are very hard to find/locate. In the UHF Band we have the now Famous Pave Paws

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-10 Thread David Murman
- From: skipp025 To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 11:39 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160 Hi Ken, ATV activity... both from Amateur Operations and of course the import Wireless Video TV Extenders. Dont' forget

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-10 Thread Jay Urish
*Sent:* Saturday, November 10, 2007 11:39 AM *Subject:* [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160 Hi Ken, ATV activity... both from Amateur Operations and of course the import Wireless Video TV Extenders. Dont' forget the wonderful RF-ID tags. We're starting

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Possible interference on 146.160

2007-11-10 Thread Nate Duehr
On Nov 10, 2007, at 10:39 AM, skipp025 wrote: In the UHF Band we have the now Famous Pave Paws System... and just to join in the fun we also have the Eplers System. A Repeater Site within a short distance of two large Air Force Bases is a very rough go... Don't forget Navy RADAR. :-) --