Al Wolfe wrote:
Eric,
Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade
portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is
only with VX6's so far. Of the VX6's actually measured one was only 200 Hz
deviation and all seemed low, that is, none
Jim wrote:
Al Wolfe wrote:
Eric,
Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade
portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is
only with VX6's so far. Of the VX6's actually measured one was only 200 Hz
deviation and all seemed low, that
I ran across a problem on a M3 and various talkies. For the most part
tone was a bit low and voice was really over deviated. It was easy to
hit 6 or 7 kKz. of transmitter deviation. The problem was talk down
of the repeater. The real problem was the low end audio response of
the portable
Thanks, guys, for all the ideas. I really don't like the idea of
ripping into a virginal Quantar because some users' radios aren't
transmitting enough PL tone.
As for the VX6's they are not running in the narrow band mode, at least
on the ones that have been checked.
Although we
Eric,
Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade
portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is
only with VX6's so far. Of the VX6's actually measured one was only 200 Hz
deviation and all seemed low, that is, none were up to 500 Hz. Have
PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:09 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL
Eric,
Thanks for your quick response. It's true that most of the ham grade
portables have far too much tone deviation as delivered. The issue here is
only
Drop in a Com Spec Board in the repeater and solve your problem.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: Al Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 9:09 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL
Eric,
Thanks
On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Al Wolfe wrote:
So the questions remain: Is the Quantar PL sensitivity
adjustable? Is it
a good thing to make it more sensitive? How do I convince some
users that
there may be a problem with their radio?
Not trying to sound sarcastic here at all, just
I doubt you would get far with Motorola since the problem is that Yaesu
is not using good engineering practice by not filtering the TX audio to
remove CTCSS components. I would start with Yaesu asking them why not.
Joe M.
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Sep 26, 2007, at 7:09 AM, Al Wolfe wrote:
] On Behalf Of MCH
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 11:26 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Quantar and PL
I doubt you would get far with Motorola since the problem is that Yaesu
is not using good engineering practice by not filtering the TX audio to
remove CTCSS
I own a VX6 and regularly use a local Quantar repeater without any
problems. To the best of my knowledge, the Quantar is stock.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Al Wolfe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We recently replaced an aging UHF machine with a Quantar for a
local ham
repeater.
Tony L. wrote:
I own a VX6 and regularly use a local Quantar repeater without any
problems. To the best of my knowledge, the Quantar is stock.
I also know of at least two people using VX-6's through a
digital-capable (set in dual-mode analog and P25, they're of course
using analog!)
12 matches
Mail list logo
