@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Antenna Choice
The area served by many of our radio sites (we are in Central
Utah), sit at approximately a 12 degree downtilt from the sites. Most
of these sites are at 3000-4000' AGL. In some
I've not seen overshoot from relatively low AGL sites either. Maybe
someone could bring up some examples of this happening, with details?
Laryn K8TVZ
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. I think what I was trying to say was there were a
The area served by many of our radio sites (we are in Central Utah), sit at
approximately a 12 degree downtilt from the sites. Most of these sites are
at 3000-4000' AGL. In some cases, we have opted for lower gain antennas to
cover close in areas better. We designate repeaters as local or wide
Simple...
The largest Decibel, Sinclair, Telewave or similar folded dipole
style antenna you can manage to put in the air.
Antennas are probably the only part of the free lunch rule...
when applied to radio system coverage.
There are two types... the standard folded dipole
-Builder] Re: Repeater Antenna Choice
The area served by many of our radio sites (we are in Central Utah), sit at
approximately a 12 degree downtilt from the sites. Most of these sites are at
3000-4000' AGL. In some cases, we have opted for lower gain antennas to cover
close in areas better. We
Chuck, how far vertically above the portables would that 420-style
antenna have been, considering the hills in the area, etc.
Laryn K8TVZ
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Chuck Kelsey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We had a DB-420 style antenna (actually it was made by Signals, but
it was
About 275 - 280 feet.
Chuck
- Original Message -
From: Laryn Lohman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 10:39 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Antenna Choice
Chuck, how far vertically above the portables would that 420
From: gervais fillion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/24 Sat AM 08:06:27 CST
To: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Antenna Choice
Hi all
we have been using here
Sinclair SRL-210 a4 for many years ,they are well built,4 dipoles
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the comments about where you want to put your signal
apply as much as some folks would have you believe. Even though the
408 pushes more gain to the horizon, it still is rated for something
like
On Nov 25, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Laryn Lohman wrote:
Hi Larry, yeah... reading back through it I transposed 408 and 420.
Nate, perhaps you could clarify that paragraph...
Anyway, I was just comparing published vertical beamwidth numbers for
various bands/manufacturers/gains. Within a degree or
Derek,
Going to the higher gain antenna may cause shadowing in some areas
close in to the repeater site if its up real high. I also like the
DB-408 antennas and am using them on my systems. The fiberglass
antennas are OK also, But if they take a lightning hit they are gone.
I had an ASP copy
Hi all
we have been using here
Sinclair SRL-210 a4 for many years ,they are well built,4 dipoles .
they have been cloned by many telecom compagny as Comprod too
we have tested Fiberglass antenna,after a time the coating of the fibreglass
dissapear and the fiber of the fiberglass broke
due to
12 matches
Mail list logo
