Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-25 Thread AJ
We have one in place right now on the 600 KHz split at 25 watts from a MastrII... Very noticeable desense... Not very happy with the setup... But we're doing the best we can with what was on the hill when we started... Oh well lol. On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:39 PM, ve7fet

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-25 Thread John J. Riddell
. The Q2330E has three cavities on each side. 73 John VE3AMZ - Original Message - From: AJ To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:19 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E We have one in place right now on the 600 KHz split at 25

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-25 Thread AJ
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E We have one in place right now on the 600 KHz split at 25 watts from a MastrII... Very noticeable desense... Not very happy with the setup... But we're doing the best we can with what was on the hill when we started... Oh well lol

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-25 Thread John J. Riddell
it for minimum VSWR...that should clean it up GE did this with a device they called a Z Matcher. John VE3AMZ - Original Message - From: AJ To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 7:35 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E Any

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-25 Thread JOHN MACKEY
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E Any suggestions for improving the situation with our existing Q2220E duplexer? We could turn the P/A down even further, but there's not much more room to work with with this 40 watt P/A from it's current

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-25 Thread Jeff DePolo
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E We have one in place right now on the 600 KHz split at 25 watts from a MastrII... Very noticeable desense... Not very happy with the setup... But we're doing the best we can with what was on the hill when we started... Oh well lol

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-25 Thread AJ
-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of AJ Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:20 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.comRepeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E We have one in place right now on the 600 KHz split

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-24 Thread ve7fet
Actually, the comment below isn't quite true. The Q2220E is a Res-Lok duplexer, but there are no machined coupling ports between the cavities. I just took the loops out of one to confirm. The coupling between the cavities is a function of the pickup loop inside the cavity, and the coax between

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-23 Thread n3dab
Yes, but we modified/replaced the loops in the cavities to get better performance. No changes were made to the harness as I recall. I don't recall the Pass/Rejectfigures at the moment (but they were comparable to other 4 cavity 2 mtr. duplexersor slightly better, but the duplexer has been

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E

2009-03-23 Thread wa6vpl
-Builder] Re: Sinclair Q2220E Yes, but we modified/replaced the loops in the cavities to get better performance. No changes were made to the harness as I recall. I don't recall the Pass/Rejectfigures at the moment (but they were comparable to other 4 cavity 2 mtr. duplexersor slightly better