On Thu, 28 May 2009, wb8art wrote:
> Thanks Eric, That is exactly what I was needing to know. This will
> give us a good starting point and since it is looking to run only 35
> watts it should be OK. That is better than I expected. Anyway I
> believe it, (the duplexer) is only rated at 50 watt
Thanks Eric, That is exactly what I was needing to know. This will give us a
good starting point and since it is looking to run only 35 watts it should be
OK. That is better than I expected. Anyway I believe it, (the duplexer) is
only rated at 50 watts.
Your a gentleman & a scholar.
Thanks
2 matches
Mail list logo