> > I would expect and take the opinion that proper emission
> > operation within legal narrow band standards using legacy
> > type accepted land mobile equipment will not be a legality
> > problem and have had that opinion confirmed more than once
> > by FCC Agents, in fact once again last week at IWCE.
 
> This would go contrary to the official document that went out 
> from Washington a few months back that specifically said that 
> equipment not certified for 12.5 KHz bandwidth for Part 90 will 
> not be legal.

> We've actually gone down this path before here, so it should 
> be in the archives somewhere....
> It was mostly directed at MastrII's, Micor's, and MSF's. Those 
> have definitely been pooh-pooh'ed.

Which obviously goes contrary to previous historical legal 
precedent established some decades back. Imagine the scenario 
that a US Government Agency might actually put out 
contradictory  information. 

s. 

Reply via email to