Yes, if you increase the surface area, it will
dissipate heat better. People have done this with
MaxTracs, but a 60w heatsink may not fit a 45w power
amp without some modification. In other words, it's
not just a bolt-on improvement. Some holes don't line
up. There was some discussion of this on
Lee Jones wrote:
Heres a question for someone to answer, IF you were to take say a gm300
45 watt radio and take say a lowband heatshrink from a maxtrac would
the bigger heat shrink help disipate the heat better or would it not
make a diference?
You want a heat sink, not heat shrink
AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] putting a bigger heat shrink on a radio?
Lee Jones wrote:
Heres a question for someone to answer, IF you were to take say a gm300
45 watt radio and take say a lowband heatshrink from a maxtrac would
the bigger heat shrink help disipate the heat better or would
Sorry I know its a heat sink I have been building data
cables at work all week and been using alot of heat
shrink lol. I just have it on the brain.
--- Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lee Jones wrote:
Heres a question for someone to answer, IF you
were to take say a gm300
45 watt radio
Understand Just a thought. Ill have to look I have a
few laying around the garage and see if the wholes
line up or not. I figured it would help.
--- Bob M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, if you increase the surface area, it will
dissipate heat better. People have done this with
MaxTracs, but
What is a heat shrink??
73
Glenn
At 09:20 PM 12/12/05, you wrote:
Heres a question for someone to answer, IF you were to take say a gm300
45 watt radio and take say a lowband heatshrink from a maxtrac would
the bigger heat shrink help disipate the heat better or would it not
make a diference?
6 matches
Mail list logo
