:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Repeater-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Dave Schmidt
*Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2006 9:56 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO
dropping code requirement today
Question
Gerald Pelnar wrote:
I, for one, was sorely disappointed with how easy is was to pass the present
extra class test.
/mini-rant
I agree that the higher level tests are too easy. I feel the same way
about driver license tests, both written and on-the-road...
/mini-rant off
--
Jim Barbour
for April Fools jokes?
Will 10 meters become the next CB band?
I will wait and see what happens here...
73
Mike - N7ZEF
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
Oh well, the end of an era. Boo-Hiss.
Bob M.
==
--- Joe Montierth [EMAIL
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
But how many of those folks actually KNEW CW, and how many were using a
program?
Joe M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone who thinks CW is dead never listened to HF in the last
, 2006 12:50:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
It is now just a matter of time. The problems with hams not understanding
what they are doing will increase. Interference will increase. Commercial
interests will petition the FCC
WB4UIV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Saturday, December 16, 2006 10:50 am
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
It is now just a matter of time. The problems with hams not
understanding what they are doing will increase. Interference
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: repeater-builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
One time 35-40? years ago, I was applying for an electronic
technician position in Pasadena California. One
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
One time 35-40? years ago, I was applying for an electronic
technician position in Pasadena California. One of the
pre-employment test questions
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO
dropping code requirement today
It is now just a matter of time. The problems with hams not
understanding what they are doing will increase. Interference
will increase. Commercial interests will petition the FCC
Paper tape machines! Man, that's what I first learned my Morse Code with.
Wasn't that McCoy ? I remember his name popping up a lot back then. (
Dinosaurs still roamed the earth back then).
Well, I'm glad I learned it, its been nothing but a source of joy to me.
Since I first got my novice call
At 12:11 PM 12/16/2006, you wrote:
Hey Ken, I didn't know you are 'that' old.
Back then you may have been a teenager ...
---Don't forget I was first licensed in 1967 at the ripe old age of
13 - back then you could both a Novice and Tech license
simultaneously (which I did).
And I was
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
It is now just a matter of time. The problems with hams not understanding
what they are doing will increase
Oh well, the end of an era. Boo-Hiss.
Bob M.
==
--- Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-269012A1.pdf
Techs get tech+ privs, code test gone for general
and
extra.
Joe
__
Do You
And the start of another.
It is entirely possible to *increase* the number of CW using hams
because of this. It's possible to snare folks into the hobby, and
then, just when they think they're secure in the lack of a need
to ever learn code--
...They find something that uses it, and the spark
And at the same time, we can train them to lubricate the dynamotors that
provide B+ to their rigs? (HT to you G's)
Gentlemen, it is time to move on. Even repeaters have voice ID nowadays.
73
Nigel,
ve3id/g4ajq
STeve Andre' wrote:
And the start of another.
It is entirely possible to
Is it a little early for April Fools jokes?
Will 10 meters become the next CB band?
I will wait and see what happens here...
73
Mike - N7ZEF
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
Oh well, the end of an era. Boo-Hiss.
Bob M
will wait and see what happens here...
73
Mike - N7ZEF
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping
code
requirement today
Oh well, the end of an era. Boo-Hiss.
Bob M.
==
--- Joe Montierth [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:skyislandpage%40yahoo.com wrote
- Original Message -
From: Jay Urish [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
The VEC's do accept submissions for the question pools
Question about this order is it effective imidiately that the code is
no longer required for new licencing and the licenced techs (w/o code) are
now equal to tech + (with code) ? OR is there an effective on
after date?
-
From: VE3ID [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 15, 2006 7:09 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping code
requirement today
And at the same time, we can train them to lubricate the dynamotors that
provide B+ to their rigs? (HT
--- Dave Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question about this order is it effective
imidiately that the code is
no longer required for new licencing and the
licenced techs (w/o code) are
now equal to tech + (with code) ? OR is there an
effective on
after date?
New rules will
, December 15, 2006 9:56 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping
code requirement today
Question about this order is it effective imidiately that the code
is no longer required for new licencing and the licenced techs
]*On Behalf Of *Dave Schmidt
*Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2006 9:56 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO dropping
code requirement today
Question about this order is it effective imidiately that the code
is no longer
Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Schmidt
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 9:56 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO
dropping code requirement today
:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Repeater-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of *Dave Schmidt
*Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2006 9:56 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] FYI: FCC officially issues RO
dropping code requirement today
Question about
But how many of those folks actually KNEW CW, and how many were using a
program?
Joe M.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone who thinks CW is dead never listened to HF in the last couple months
to the ARRL CW SS contest, the CQWW DX CW Contest, or to the recent 5A7A
DXpedition to Libya.
26 matches
Mail list logo
