Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-12-01 Thread Mark Holman
. for that freq. range ? Curious ? Mark Holman Isn't Radio Fun !! ?? - Original Message - From: Mr. Edgar McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 11:45 AM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720 I now have 3 2720s and yes they are ham

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-29 Thread Mr. Edgar McKinney
NTIA? Ed? Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-26 Thread grizzarv
From: Mr. Edgar McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 07:41:28 -0500 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720 True. You still have to deal with the problem of the radio not being certified under Part 90 for your church usage and not being NTIA compliant. Not hard cause the part

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-26 Thread Mr. Edgar McKinney
Not hard cause the part 90 does not apply to inter gov usage. Ed - kb8qeu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Mr. Edgar McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:45:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720 I now have 3 2720s and yes they are ham rigs. Also

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-25 Thread Mr. Edgar McKinney
: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720 What is an IC-2720? If it's a ham rig, it's not type accepted for the commercial freqs you mention (at least in the US), so it cannot be used for this purpose. And even if you use type-accepted gear, as someone else pointed out, licensing that UHF freq for a link

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-25 Thread grizzarv
From: Mr. Edgar McKinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 11:45:04 -0500 Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720 I now have 3 2720s and yes they are ham rigs. Also, They are tuned for local comercial freq that we do church ops on as well commercial freq for Severe Weather

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-24 Thread Frederick E. Fitte
Anthony, Are you using 461.800 as a link freq.? It appears to. Am nit sure you could even license this since 461.800 is Tx freq. for a community repeater pair. Is this to be a licensed configuration? If not the biggest problem you could encounter is the FCC ! Fred - Original Message -

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-24 Thread mch
First, desense problems (how far apart would the two VHF antennas be?) Second, licensing issues, perhaps? On UHF, I would run dummy loads (frequency issues aside). Joe M. Anthoyn Lewis wrote: I want to use 2 IC 2720 to repeat on vhf for ex IC #1 RX 151.1000 tone 151.4TX 461.8000

RE: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-24 Thread Steve Bosshard \(NU5D\)
Notwithstanding the minor issue of FCC type acceptance and licensing, how far apart physically would the two 2720's be? Running split site a 1/2 mile or so apart might do OK, but wouldn't a duplexer cost less than 2 antennas and two sites, or if temporary mobile installations and two vehicles

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-24 Thread Jim B.
Frederick E. Fitte wrote: Anthony, Are you using 461.800 as a link freq.? It appears to. Am nit sure you could even license this since 461.800 is Tx freq. for a community repeater pair. Is this to be a licensed configuration? If not the biggest problem you could encounter is the FCC !

Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720

2004-11-24 Thread Robert Grizzard
AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] IC 2720 What is an IC-2720? If it's a ham rig, it's not type accepted for the commercial freqs you mention (at least in the US), so it cannot be used for this purpose. And even if you use type-accepted gear, as someone else