Dicx, you are exactly right. And I am sure you wrote the FCC to
warn them of this on xx/yy/zz, oh, remind me, when was it you wrote
them Maybe with three typos in four lines you don't know???
At 18:45 1/22/2009, rert...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>We can, Mike, but only if it's amateur radio.
riginal Message -
From: Kris Kirby
To: Repeater-Builder@ <mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com>
yahoogroups.com
Sent: 18 January, 2009 14:03
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Starpoint - Good on 2.4G??
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Scott Zimmerman wrote:
> In the past few weeks, I
But, if you have a ham license, those Part 15 power limits don't mean
squat. Remember, the 13 cm band goes from 2.3-2.45 GHz. It's not 2.3 GHz
only.
Channels 1-6 of an 802.11b/g system are shared Part97/Part15. Channels 0
and -1 are Part 97 only if you want to avoid interference from Part 15
u
epeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 18 January, 2009 14:03
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Motorola Starpoint - Good on 2.4G??
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Scott Zimmerman wrote:
> In the past few weeks, I have literally fell into some 2.x GHz
> Motorola StarPoint gear; complete with antennas a
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Scott Zimmerman wrote:
> In the past few weeks, I have literally fell into some 2.x GHz
> Motorola StarPoint gear; complete with antennas and feedline. This has
> prompted my feeble mind to ask some questions:
>
> 1. Can this stuff be "up-banded" to 2.4GHz? If so, does anyon
5 matches
Mail list logo
