:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
Careful! That channelization map only shows the CENTER frequency of the
direct-sequence spread-spectrum channel you're using. I believe Mr.
Reese is incorrect in his statement that channels 7 and 8 are in the ham
band.
Each channel
Kevin Custer wrote:
Bob Dengler wrote:
...and if internet isn't available at the site, how about using 802.11b or
a to bring it in? I've yet with play with that stuff, but it sounds to me
like a pair of gain antennas at each end could get you a couple of miles to
where you would have
Kevin Custer wrote:
Bob Dengler wrote:
...and if internet isn't available at the site, how about using 802.11b or
a to bring it in? I've yet with play with that stuff, but it sounds to me
like a pair of gain antennas at each end could get you a couple of miles to
where you would have
I am interested as well... is that maybe the USGS TOPO package that is
marketed by National Geographic? The cross-section at the bottom of
graphic 3 looks vaguely familiar...
mike
At 11:43 AM 12/10/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Some images:
Jim B. wrote:
Cool stuff, Kevin! I didn't know 802.11b could be told to go to freqs in
the ham band, or that it could use a ham call as an ID. Sounds like
something good to play with.
I can see using this for things like Echolink/IRLP, etc. Or a
non-internet WLAN system...
BTW, the 3D pic
Kevin Custer wrote:
Jim B. wrote:
Cool stuff, Kevin! I didn't know 802.11b could be told to go to freqs in
the ham band, or that it could use a ham call as an ID. Sounds like
something good to play with.
I can see using this for things like Echolink/IRLP, etc. Or a
non-internet WLAN
Mike Perryman wrote:
I am interested as well... is that maybe the USGS TOPO package that is
marketed by National Geographic? The cross-section at the bottom of
graphic 3 looks vaguely familiar...
mike
DeLorme Topo USA 4.0
Kevin
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the
Message-
From: Kevin Custer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 12:02 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
Mike Perryman wrote:
I am interested as well... is that maybe the USGS TOPO package that is
marketed
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:26:21 -0500, Kevin Custer wrote:
however feel free to discuss the
technical nature of the subject in any detail here.
Hi Kevin:
A bunch of us were thinking about setting up a Ham
radio only network here near Kitchener. Can you give
any details on the reprogramming of
I have a 6.65 mile non-line-of-site path to bring internet access to
my
home from the center of town where our T1 line exists. I use 802.11b
(2.4 gHz) with larger grids (about 24 dB gain) on each end. There are
different cards available these days that have better receiver
sensitivities
At 07:54 PM 12/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:
A bunch of us were thinking about setting up a Ham
radio only network here near Kitchener. Can you give
any details on the reprogramming of the hardware?
---I'm curious about this myself. I'm installing a Linux machine at my
site soon and this would be
At 08:10 PM 12/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:
The hardware is Canadian based out of BC, and their
website is:
https://tranzeo.com/index.php?section_id=10
---Thanks for the info, Tedd! Let me know what you find out. Although I'm
thinking this may be a bit of an overkill for my situation but I'm not
GHz
Channels 1 through 8 fall in the Amateur band of 2390 to 2450 GHz.
73
Richard D. Reese
http://www.wa8dbw.ifip.com
- Original Message -
From: Tedd Doda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:00:12 -0800, Ken Arck wrote:
Hopefully, Kevin's suggestion is Linux usable as well.
Hi Ken:
I'm the feed point of a commercial 802.11 network, and
using their hardware makes things look very easy.
The hardware is Canadian based out of BC, and their
website is:
:15 PM CST
From: Richard D. Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
There are 11 channels used as the standard for 802.11b/g.
They are:
Chan 1 2412 GHz
Chan 2 2417 GHz
Chan 3 2422 GHz
Chan 4 2427
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 20:24:17 -0500, Richard D. Reese wrote:
Channels 1 through 8 fall in the Amateur band of 2390 to 2450 GHz.
Thanks for clearing that up Richard. I was under
the impression that we had some frequencies that were
not available for the general public.
Tedd Doda, VE3TJD
Lazer
- Original Message -
From: Tedd Doda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 8:43 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 20:24:17 -0500, Richard D. Reese wrote:
Channels 1 through 8 fall in the Amateur
Kevin,
I am doing exactly the same thing to get internet out to the hamshack...
using 12dB Cushcraft collinear cheapies, with my callsign VPN. It is also
operating in the ham band. Probably wouldn't pass the test if push came to
shove. The link is only used for call lookups monitoring the DX
Mike Perryman wrote:
I had no idea there was this kind of interest in this subject!
Maybe I should take this time to promote this list?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wireless-Internet/
Kevin Custer
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
Another ... list ?
Groan ...
Neil - WA6KLA
Kevin Custer wrote:
Mike Perryman wrote:
I had no idea there was this kind of interest in this subject!
Maybe I should take this time to promote this list?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wireless-Internet/
Kevin Custer
: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:26:21 -0500, Kevin Custer wrote:
however feel free to discuss the
technical nature of the subject in any detail here.
Hi Kevin:
A bunch of us were thinking about setting up a Ham
: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: 802.11b wireless
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:26:21 -0500, Kevin Custer wrote:
however feel free to discuss the
technical nature of the subject in any detail here.
Hi Kevin:
A bunch of us were thinking about setting up a Ham
radio only network here
Mike Perryman wrote:
I have heard some rumblings of TCP/IP experimentation in the ham bands, but
no details as of yet. It is a subject I am very interested in. There would
be numerous uses for that concept as it relates to our hobby. Hopefully
someone can shed a little light on the subject as
Has anyone tried a bi-directional amplifier like this
one on ebay;
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=61815item=5736479461rd=1ssPageName=WDVW
Check the ARRL site for more information on ham use;
http://www.arrl.org/hsmm/project.html
And check this link for a cool waveguide
24 matches
Mail list logo
