On 4/15/07, N9WYS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think so Skipp... Seems to me I remember that there is some law on
the books that requires a manufacturer to provide parts support for their
product for 7 years. I wish I could find it...
I checked Google for 7-year support and got about 1200
Ken Arck wrote:
---Don't tell me that! I'm looking at a '94 Vette for my wife!
Damn good trade Sir! :-) Mike
] Re: Replacement of an older Repeater
Ken Arck wrote:
---Don't tell me that! I'm looking at a '94 Vette for my wife!
Damn good trade Sir! :-) Mike
In a message dated 4/15/2007 12:32:50 AM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
That's interesting since the FLEX cable in an HT1000 went NLA before
they even stopped making new radios! That's right - you could buy a new
radio that had one, but if it went out, you have to get one
I don't think so Skipp... Seems to me I remember that there is some law on
the books that requires a manufacturer to provide parts support for their
product for 7 years. I wish I could find it...
I checked Google for 7-year support and got about 1200 hits, but most of
these also reference a 4-
In a message dated 4/15/2007 9:10:32 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thought manufacturers were required by some obscure law (federal?)
to be able to supply parts for any item marketed for 7 years after
it's sale... or maybe I was dreaming.
There are such
At 12:03 PM 4/15/2007, you wrote:
here are such laws, but as a practical matter they are worthless
because there is no cap on what they can charge for replacement
parts. The most prolific abuser of these laws with astronomical
replacement parts cost for older models is the automobile industry.
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Replacement of an older Repeater
I remember the 7 year support rule too, but I don’t know why…
Bill
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of N9WYS
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 8:35
I don't know your wife, Ken, but it sounds like a good trade. ;-
Joe M.
Ken Arck wrote:
I'm looking at a '94 Vette for my wife!
Ken
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 4/15/2007 9:10:32 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] writes:
I thought manufacturers were required by some obscure law (federal?)
to be able to supply parts for any item marketed for 7 years after
it's
Not to worry, Ken. There are PLENTY of purveyors of parts for the Vette...
The primary one that comes to mind for me is Mid America Corvette. Of
course, they're only about a 3 hour drive from my house. And then there's
Ecklers, and Corvette Central, and.
I own a '74 coupe. (Yes,
I thought manufacturers were required by some obscure law (federal?) to be
able to supply parts for any item marketed for 7 years after it's sale... or
maybe I was dreaming.
???
Mark - N9WYS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of skipp025
Back in days of old... when
I remember the 7 year support rule too, but I dont know why
Bill
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of N9WYS
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 8:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Replacement
: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Replacement of an older Repeater
I thought manufacturers were required by some obscure law (federal?) to be
able to supply parts for any item marketed for 7 years after it's sale... or
maybe I was dreaming.
???
Mark - N9WYS
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
