Basically the name and the general form factor are the only
similarities. The hardware is completely different. 2 different
generations of design. Nothing interchangeable except the microphone
and that is only on some of them. Later mics on exec II were different
Doug
At 05:06 PM
I think the exec I had a tube final RX was solid state looks nothing like
an exec II so I would say no.
tom
[Original Message]
From: Chris Curtis demo...@rollanet.org
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: 3/3/2009 5:06:57 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] exec I vs exec II
Anyone have
Thanks for all the responses.
Chris
Kb0wlf
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Thomas Oliver
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 4:29 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] exec I vs
, 2009 5:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] exec I vs exec II
I think the exec I had a tube final RX was solid state looks nothing like
an exec II so I would say no.
tom
[Original Message]
From: Chris Curtis demo...@rollanet.org
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: 3/3/2009 5:06:57
: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] exec I vs exec II
I think the exec I had a tube final RX was solid state looks nothing like
an exec II so I would say no.
tom
[Original Message]
From: Chris Curtis demo...@rollanet.org
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
At 3/3/2009 15:54, you wrote:
The MASTR Exec (1) came in two flavors (at least here in Canada), the
Exec with a tube final and the Royal Exec with a solid state final. The
receivers in both cases was very similar. The receivers are very
sensitive and also quite tough.
...but rather prone to
6 matches
Mail list logo
