RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Setting HT600/P200/MT1000
Don't ya just love it. You ask for some technical advice and immediately the Wanna be radio police assume you are doing something wrong! From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of W. H. Phinizy Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 12:31 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Setting HT600/P200/MT1000 --- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com mailto:Repeater-Builder%40yahoogroups.com , ka1jfy walter.howard...@... wrote: Please, PLEASE, P L E A S E tell me you're NOT trying to use those wideband only radios on a narrowband Part 90 system! They will NOT meet the emission mask for narrowband operation without turning the total deviation below 2 kHz. And the receivers will still be wideband. Bad choice. Bite the bullet and buy some narrow capable radios. Leave those for GMRS or Ham use. WalterH O.k., WalterH, I will tell you I am NOT trying to use those wideband only radios on a narrowband Part 90 system. Thank you for your considerable technical help. 73, Bill, k6whp
RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: What Have I got and can I get information about it.
I have 3 of them, One has HT-90 crystal controlled units inside. The other 2 are GP-300 and can be programmed. It is a bit of a hassle, as I do not have whatever is the proper interface, so I took the units out and popped them into gp300 cases and programmed them, then put them back into the Systel. Works! If yours has very rectangled shaped units that are just boxes, then it is most likely HT-90 and crystal controlled. Maybe you can find crystals, not sure. But if the 2 units look like a HT out of the case with speaker hole, kind of rounded corners, then it is probably the GP300 unit and much better. Mine work great with GMRS. -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Rick Beatty Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:37 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: What Have I got and can I get information about it. I recently was given a SYSTEL unit made by Motorola, on 464.../469... with duplexer and looks to be a repeater, with low level output (2w or so). Would be great for remote work on GMRS, does anyone on the group have data/information on this little cutie? Also I am looking for a schematic for an amplifier used with the portable. a UHF with the number N1275a? thanks in advance -- Rick
RE: [Repeater-Builder] RE: What Have I got and can I get information about it.
Huh? Since when is a GP300 not type accepted for GMRS? News to me, but I have been wrong before. (once!) -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Milt Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 2:12 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RE: What Have I got and can I get information about it. Rick, The Systel was a 2 watt repeater with a telephone interconnect designed for small on-site systems. I doubt that it would be type accepted for GMRS as it was based on one or more series of portables (HT-90 and/or GP300). Of course the phone patch would not be usable on GMRS either. MIlt N3LTQ - Original Message - From: Rick Beatty mailto:nu7...@gmail.com To: Repeater-Builder@ mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 12:37 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] RE: What Have I got and can I get information about it. I recently was given a SYSTEL unit made by Motorola, on 464.../469... with duplexer and looks to be a repeater, with low level output (2w or so). Would be great for remote work on GMRS, does anyone on the group have data/information on this little cutie? Also I am looking for a schematic for an amplifier used with the portable. a UHF with the number N1275a? thanks in advance -- Rick
RE: [Repeater-Builder] How to set up a basic crossband repeater system in Pub...
I have to agree with Chris, this is a technical group; the legalities should not be of concern here. (Unless maybe someone asks for info) I f you are in car dealership, do you ask everyone that is buying a car if they have a drivers license? Unless there is a specific reason then why does everyone assume they are doing something wrong? Do all these people work for the FCC? Just my 2 cents! Probably not even worth that much! -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wd8chl Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 3:01 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] How to set up a basic crossband repeater system in Pub... Chris Carruba wrote: I'm sorry but I cannot resist the following.. um comment / opinion It really amuses me how many get stressed over whether someone else seeking info on something is properly licensed to perform such tasks.. I mean really.. get a life and stop policing the list :) Best Regards, Chris Carruba (WQIK389) And what makes me mad is how many people don't bother to look to see if something is legal or not. This case, while I have no doubt they are licensed, the question still remains whether it is legal to repeat one to the other. Cross service repeating is not legal. Repeating a business pool channel to a public safety pool is a no-no. Repeating Part 90 to Part 95 (GMRS) is a no-no. As long as all freqs involved are public safety freqs, all is well. And the UHF is at least FB2 or higher. This is something he has to look into.
