RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Delay Line

2004-01-07 Thread Paul Finch
Paul,

I am asking $50.00 each.  If they are getting ringing and distortion they
are hooking it incorrectly.

Paul




-Original Message-
From: ac0y5 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 10:06 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Delay Line


Paul, what do thoes animals go for these days? When we converted our
paging system to simulcast we put thoes in the Quintron stations and
some into Micor stations for the delay for simulcasting.
73 Paul
AC0Y

--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Paul Finch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 By the way, if anyone needs some let me know, I have several.

 Paul


   -Original Message-
   From: Lee Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 8:55 PM
   To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
   Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Delay Line


   Power? It doesnt require any power. Its a delay line,no active
components!
 We had huindreds of these on paging stations back in the day,they
were quite
 expensive. 73,Lee
 - Original Message -
 From: Dave Stephens
 To: Repeater-Builder
 Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:40 PM
 Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Micor Delay Line


 Hello all,
 I got a Micor Lo-Band Paging transmitter and I found an
interesting item
 within. It is a delay line made by Allen Avionics. below are links
to the
 front and back images I took of it.

 http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/thebasement/images/delayfront.jpg
 http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/thebasement/images/delayback.jpg

 what I want to know is (because I have now manuals on this
micor) how
 does it work? all I see is an audio in and an audio out on the
thing. there
 are no power connections. and the thing is completely sealed.

 Is the power fed in with the audio lines?

 Dave Stephens
 KF6WJA
 Santa Clarita Amateur Radio Club
 www.W6JW.org
 Vice-President - Webmaster - Newsletter Editor





   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.







Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/









 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Delay Line

2003-12-16 Thread Lee Williams
I agree,they arent the best delay solution. We were never happy with
their performance,audio sounded phase distorted and limited response.
They were replaced with Glenayre's with digital delay cards that
worked much better. Old technology vs new...73,Lee,N3APP

- Original Message - 
From: Jeff DePolo WN3A [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Delay Line


  Worked very well as long as the microwave
  hops to the site didn't have too much
  group delay.

 Those Allen Avionics analog delay lines have horrible group delay,
 distortion/ringing, and frequency response abberations.  I've put
them on my
 HP 8903 audio analyzer and decided they weren't going to be
worthwhile for
 my simulcast repeater project.  You can tweak their performance them
to some
 degree by tailoring both the source and load Z depending on the
delay
 setting but I never found a combination that I was thrilled with.
I've got
 several GE Delta-S radios on the air as exciters that I modified for
use
 with an external GPS reference oscillator.  Right now they're on the
air as
 a sloppycast system with no audio delay correction.  Someday when
I have
 more time (yeah, right) I want to work on a digital delay solution.
For
 now, lacking audio delay, the repeaters that are being sloppycasted
are far
 enough apart that the distortion in areas where there is a little
overlap is
 noticible but not unbearable.

 How well did the voice simulcast system work with the AA delay
lines?  How
 bad was the audio in the areas with common coverage?  I've heard
voice
 paging on Micor PURC simulcast systems and always though it sounded
 horrible...

 --- Jeff

 -
 Jeff DePolo WN3A
 Broadcast and Communications Consultant





 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Delay Line

2003-12-16 Thread Jeff DePolo WN3A
 The original application was a 
tone and voice paging 
 system. You'd have to know what this delay line was 
 orignally spec for. 

I have two different models.  I found the datasheets for both and they were
spec'ed for something like 300-2800 Hz frequency response at something like
+/- 3 dB.  There were no specs for distortion or group delay/phase
distortion.

 Nice, but one must start with the initial 
 system preformance and align it right. Most 
 people don't know how to properly align 
 simulcast systems. 

I know the prerequisites for both RF and audio performance, including the
potential benefits of staggered frequency offsets, optimization for the
worst overlap area(s) versus simple geographic distance/time delay,
maintaining consistant frequency response and proper AF bandwidth limiting,
minimizing receiver IF distortion/group delay, etc.  I'm not saying what I
have on the air right now, without audio delay, is correct...I was just
saying that the transmitters are still on the air GPS-locked, the packages
are all built identically (with well-tuned IF's on the link receivers
listening to the same outbound source transmitter, transmitter AF mods,
etc.)  but I haven't dealt with the audio delay issues yet.

 Probably sounds rough in areas with overlap. 

It's not great, but it's not terrible.  Fortunately the sites are within a
few miles' difference in distance from the origination point so the delay
error is only a few tens of ms.  It sounds a bit watery in the worst
overlap areas where both signals are relatively weak and compete with each
other by probably only a few dB.  In areas where there is a bigger delta in
signal strengths the effect is obviously much less noticible due to capture.
Still sounds better than Nextel anyway :-)

 S-Comm makes a killer digital delay board that's 
 really cheap (cost wise) with excellent 
 preformance. 

The resolution in the delay settings is way too coarse though.  The old BBD
devices theoretically could provide the resolution needed, but they have
inherent drawbacks on their own, let alone the time delay stability issues.
Better digital delays are available from Simulcast Solutions and others.

 You could not tell it was a simulcast system, 
 other than it was loud in all places and 
 sounded great. 

Sounds like it worked better than many of the systems that have been
installed within the last few years on 800 MHz around here...

 Then something was not done right. Every one of 
 them should sound good, else its back to the 
 drawing board. 

I think the intentional frequency offets that were done to improve digital
paging worked against them when sending voice pages.  What is best for FEC
and minimizing inter-symbol interference for simulcast digital paging isn't
necessarily the most pleasant-sounding when sending voice pages...it may
have been a tradeoff.

--- Jeff


Jeff DePolo WN3A - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Broadcast and Communications Consultant 





 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 




Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Micor Delay Line

2003-12-16 Thread Nate Duehr

On Tuesday, Dec 16, 2003, at 14:46 America/Denver, [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
 S-Comm makes a killer digital delay board that's
 really cheap (cost wise) with excellent
 preformance. If you have an older controller
 with an audio delay board, you can diddle it,
 but it won't stay on long term. You'd have to
 reset it every x-months/weeks. You need one
 less number of delays than transmitters you
 have on the air.

Bob sold the rights to the digital delay board to another company quite 
some time ago now.

S-Com no longer sells them.  ICS does.

http://www.scomcontrollers.com/3rdparty.shtml
http://www.ics-ctrl.com/dadm/dsdadm.html

Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - WY0X




 

Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/