Thanks everyone for the comments on this topic. I will report back
later and let you all know how DTV 02 and 6m get along.
Paul N1BUG
Right. Frankly, I couldn't are less about interfering with a Ch.2, as
long as I am clean. Front end overload of a TV set is something
unavoidable in this circumstance.
We have a DTV Ch2 here in Cleveland now (they are supposed to move up to
UHF at the changeover). They are wreaking severe
Hap Griffin wrote:
The specifications for digital out of channel noise are tighter than
for analog. Also, digital is generally running less power than
analog, so the combination of the two should spell much LESS
interference on 6m from a channel 2 digital transmitter.
Hap Griffin VP -
wd8chl wrote:
Hap Griffin wrote:
The specifications for digital out of channel noise are tighter than
for analog. Also, digital is generally running less power than
analog, so the combination of the two should spell much LESS
interference on 6m from a channel 2 digital transmitter.
Hap
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
That's what I'm afraid of. It's already nearly impossible to do
anything on 6m around here without problems with ch 2 analog. Once
they go digital on ch 2 I'm expecting even more issues. But I guess
time will tell
- Original Message -
From: Luc Pernot
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:20 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
I had the impression that they were not allowing DTV on band I because of
multipath problems !
Luc
is too high
or sumthin'
Gary
- Original Message -
From: Luc Pernot
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 7:20 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
I had the impression that they were not allowing DTV on band I
-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul N1BUG
*Sent:* Saturday, January 10, 2009 9:42 PM
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
That's what I'm afraid of. It's already nearly impossible to do
] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
If you interfere with the digital signal, the viewer will not know
anything as to there being interference.
All they will see is that they cannot see the channel 2 TV station.
On the flip side, the digital wide band noise generated by the TV
station will probably render 6M totally
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Kelsey
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
Unfortunately for Paul, his station will revert back to channel 2.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message
Message -
From: Ray Brown
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
- Original Message -
From: Paul N1BUG paul_n1...@verizon.net
After transition I will have a local channel
ch 2 vs 6m
The DTV mask specifications are tighter for digital than for analog for out
of channel noise. In fact, it takes a special setup to even measure it since
spectrum analyzers generally don't have the dynamic range to measure it
directly.
Hap Griffin WZ4O
VP - Engineering
SCETV
That's what I'm afraid of. It's already nearly impossible to do
anything on 6m around here without problems with ch 2 analog. Once
they go digital on ch 2 I'm expecting even more issues. But I guess
time will tell...
Paul
MCH wrote:
If it's like any other digital transmitters, more.
Joe
if
they are on the low end of the band. Good luck with it. Let us know how it
goes.
Chuck
- Original Message -
From: Paul N1BUG paul_n1...@verizon.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 9:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
If you interfere with the digital signal, the viewer will not know
anything as to there being interference.
All they will see is that they cannot see the channel 2 TV station.
On the flip side, the digital wide band noise generated by the TV
station will probably render 6M totally useless.
The
If you have an analog CH 2, you likely won't have a digital CH 2 unless
they switch back from the DTV channel they have been assigned to their
legacy channel.
In my area, our channel 2 is on CH 25 for DTV. From what I understand,
they will *not* be moving back to CH 2. YE!
Joe M.
Unfortunately for Paul, his station will revert back to channel 2.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: MCH m...@nb.net
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] DTV ch 2 vs 6m
If you have an analog CH 2, you
I think this is on topic for the list since it could affect some 6
meter repeater owners.
After transition I will have a local channel broadcasting DTV on
their low VHF channel 2 assignment. I'm curious... does anyone know
whether DTV will be more (or less) susceptible to interference from
That's a good question, after all of us got use to the channel 2
problems from analogue. Locally our channel two is staying on the air
with analogue as we in Canada are not changing for some time. It is
possible I will be receiving new digital signals as well as analogue
interference when the
If it's like any other digital transmitters, more.
Joe M.
Paul N1BUG wrote:
I think this is on topic for the list since it could affect some 6
meter repeater owners.
After transition I will have a local channel broadcasting DTV on
their low VHF channel 2 assignment. I'm curious... does
How about the Digital noise being created that wil interfer with 6 meter
operations.
David
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, MCH wrote:
If it's like any other digital transmitters, more.
Joe M.
Paul N1BUG wrote:
I think this is on topic for the list since it could affect some 6
meter
- Original Message -
From: Paul N1BUG paul_n1...@verizon.net
After transition I will have a local channel broadcasting DTV on
their low VHF channel 2 assignment. I'm curious... does anyone know
whether DTV will be more (or less) susceptible to interference from
ham radio
22 matches
Mail list logo
