Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction (ic-230)

2004-04-09 Thread Neil McKie
Or a 80D or 140D ... Neil wd8chl wrote: Hi Skipp, And we've seen some sloppy engineering in the design of the audio and limiter circuits. What you're saying here Bob... is that you've owned at least one Icom IC-230 at some time in the past. :-) Wow-there's one

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction (ic-230)

2004-04-08 Thread wd8chl
Hi Skipp, And we've seen some sloppy engineering in the design of the audio and limiter circuits. What you're saying here Bob... is that you've owned at least one Icom IC-230 at some time in the past. :-) Wow-there's one I haven't heard in a long time-I had one of those

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction (ic-230)

2004-04-07 Thread skipp025
[paste] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I will readily admit that available PM exciters can have all sorts of shortcomings. They distort when you ask for a lot of deviation at very low frequencies like CTCSS. There are inherent nonlinearities in the varactor tank circuit that create a little

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Audio Reproduction (ic-230)

2004-04-07 Thread scomind
Hi Skipp, And we've seen some sloppy engineering in the design of the audio and limiter circuits.What you're saying here Bob... is that you've owned at least one Icom IC-230 at some time in the past. :-) While the mobiles probably suffer from the same kind of engineering shortcuts, I was