Hi Folks,
I know it's been done a lot, but I have no experience in
having two repeaters simulcasting.
Here's the info:
There is an existing repeater that has some coverage issues
in a neighboring area. The folks in that area, while still
wanting to be on the same output frequency, will put a
Hi Folks,
I know it's been done a lot, but I have no experience in
having two repeaters simulcasting.
Here's the info:
There is an existing repeater that has some coverage issues
in a neighboring area. The folks in that area, while still
wanting to be on the same output frequency, will put
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, tahrens301 wrote:
There is an existing repeater that has some coverage issues in a
neighboring area. The folks in that area, while still wanting to be
on the same output frequency, will put a 2nd repeater (with a
different rx PL tone) up on a hill.
This isn't
Hi Kris,
But when the dispatcher was sending tones to both repeaters, isn't
that simulcasting? That would be the only time that I could see
any kind of issue, as the mobile/portable units wouldn't be
transmitting on both at the same time.
Thanks,
Tim
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Tim Ahrens wrote:
But when the dispatcher was sending tones to both repeaters, isn't
that simulcasting? That would be the only time that I could see any
kind of issue, as the mobile/portable units wouldn't be transmitting
on both at the same time.
How is it that the
Here in the county, all the fire repeaters have the same
output frequency pl tone, but different input pl tones.
They use separate radios for each area (E, W, etc).
What they would do in our case would be to allocate
(on their console) a different radio for the additional
repeater.
I believe
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Tim Ahrens wrote:
Here in the county, all the fire repeaters have the same output
frequency pl tone, but different input pl tones.
They use separate radios for each area (E, W, etc).
What they would do in our case would be to allocate (on their console)
a different
Hi Kris,
Thanks for the additional information.
I've been conversing with Milt off line, and I think the
only way this will work will be for them to sequentially
dispatch the two different departments. First on on repeater
#1, and then on #2.
Their thought was to use two different radios with
Most likely they dispatch in sequence - over one repeater than over the
other.
Joe M.
Kris Kirby wrote:
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Tim Ahrens wrote:
But when the dispatcher was sending tones to both repeaters, isn't
that simulcasting? That would be the only time that I could see any
kind of
,
361 Camboon road, Biloela.4715
Ph 0749922449 Mb 0409159932
Hm 0749922574 Fx 0749922767
www.kerinvalecomaudio.com.au
---Original Message---
From: MCH
Date: 11/25/09 10:20:03
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Simulcasting of Repeaters
Most likely
*---Original Message---*
*From:* MCH m...@nb.net
*Date:* 11/25/09 10:20:03
*To:* Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
*Subject:* Re: [Repeater-Builder] Simulcasting of Repeaters
Most likely they dispatch in sequence - over one repeater than over the
other.
Joe M.
Kris Kirby
11 matches
Mail list logo
