RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Rx is Better than TX, Why

2005-01-25 Thread Mathew Quaife
nothing at all to the system. Will have to watch if over the next few days and see. Mathew -Original Message- From: kf4vgx [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 6:44 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Rx is Better than TX

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Rx is Better than TX, Why

2005-01-25 Thread Daron J. Wilson
If a 2 meter repeater antenna is broken, it'll affect both receive and transmit, and likely have severe duplex noise which again he doesn't complain about having that either. We tried a TRAM dual band antenna, looks just like the diamond type of setup, on UHF repeater. It worked well,

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Rx is Better than TX, Why

2005-01-25 Thread Mathew Quaife
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 6:55 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Rx is Better than TX, Why If a 2 meter repeater antenna is broken, it'll affect both receive and transmit, and likely have severe duplex noise which again

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Repeater Rx is Better than TX, Why

2005-01-25 Thread Dave Gingrich
On Jan 25, 2005, at 9:59, Mathew Quaife wrote: This very well could have been it as well, never checked the antenna, it had snowed here, yesterday was nearly up to 32 degrees, might have melted some ice off the antenna. Whatever it was, it's back to normal this morning. OR...