On Jun 3, 2007, at 12:07 PM, Don Kupferschmidt wrote:
I've thought about this since the thread started. Don't you think
that the
godfathers of the controllers, (SCOM, ACC and others), would have
incorporated the paging tones into their systems UNLESS they had
done their
homework as to
Chris,
OK - switching to serious mode for now.
Using the one transmission to one radio argument doesn't float... What
about a group discussion or ragchew on the repeater (or any other
frequency/mode, for that matter?? During those, you are technically
transmitting your message to more than one
Good catch, Laryn! I think this supports my previous assertion, too.
Mark - N9WYS
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Laryn Lohman
97.3 Definitions (10) Broadcasting. Transmissions intended for
reception by the general public, either direct or
and control ops of the repeater.
Just my $0.02 1/2 worth . . . .
Don, KD9PT
- Original Message -
From: n9wys [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2007 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: paging system
Chris,
OK - switching to serious mode
Threaded in...
n9wys wrote:
Chris,
OK - switching to serious mode for now.
Using the one transmission to one radio argument doesn't float... What
about a group discussion or ragchew on the repeater (or any other
frequency/mode, for that matter?? During those, you are technically
5 matches
Mail list logo
