Again, the requirement to discontinue transmitting within 5 seconds of
the loss of the input signal was removed from the rules. So, your tail
can be 30 days long now - retransmitting anything or not.
Joe M.
n...@no6b.com wrote:
At 4/12/2009 15:04, you wrote:
Yet Amateur Radio repeaters can
At 4/13/2009 04:10, you wrote:
Again, the requirement to discontinue transmitting within 5 seconds of
the loss of the input signal was removed from the rules. So, your tail
can be 30 days long now - retransmitting anything or not.
The 5 second rule may be gone, but I can guarantee if the
At 4/12/2009 22:36, you wrote:
Didn't something come out a few years ago where the FCC relaxed those rules
and a repeater can now ID every 10 mins without activity?
Not unless beacons are allowed in the same band segments as repeaters.
Bob NO6B
True, but no interference, no request, and with the transmission comes
the 10-minute ID requirement.
Note that I also never said it made sense. It IS the government we are
talking about here...
Joe M.
n...@no6b.com wrote:
At 4/13/2009 04:10, you wrote:
Again, the requirement to discontinue
Been looking. just haven't hit paydirt yet!
73,
Mike
WM4B
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Mullarkey
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 9:59 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID
Go to the www.fcc.gov http://www.fcc.gov/ web page and search there. They
are bound by law to post all nasty grams there and are available for the
public to view.
Hope this helps.
Mike
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 8:58 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
Go to the www.fcc.gov http://www.fcc.gov/ web page and search there.
They
are bound by law to post all nasty grams there and are available for the
public to view.
Hope this helps.
Mike
Besemer (WM4B)
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 10:51 AM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
Been looking. just haven't hit paydirt yet!
73,
Mike
WM4B
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil
At 4/12/2009 11:55, you wrote:
Mike, I am sitting here wondering if a nasty-gram would be considered
enforcement ? If they are two different things then looking in the
enforcement section might not be the right place.
Generally speaking, the FCC has decreed that a repeater shall not speak
No
it was within the last year or so.
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of George Henry
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 2:30 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
Unfortunately
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
Mike, I am sitting here wondering if a nasty-gram would be considered
enforcement? If they are two different things then looking in the
enforcement section might not be the right place.
Randy
From
] On Behalf Of n...@no6b.com
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 3:42 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
At 4/12/2009 11:55, you wrote:
Mike, I am sitting here wondering if a nasty-gram would be considered
enforcement ? If they are two
Yet Amateur Radio repeaters can legally transmit 24/7/365 (literally)
and would then be required to put out and ID every 10 minutes...
Note that this was not always the case - the requirement that repeaters
cease transmitting within 5 seconds was removed from Part 97 in the 90s.
Joe M.
At 06:10 AM 04/12/09, you wrote:
I know were not supposed to discuss FCC rules
on this forum, so I hope this isnt across the line.
Im trying to find a Rileygram citing a repeater
owner because his repeater IDd at 10-minute
intervals without user input (beaconing).
Does anybody happen
I hear a repeater in the area that Id's a lot but it is also carrier squelch
and the squelch pops a lot 24/7 and that probably caused this one to id a lot.
It does not seem to be at a regular interval and some days are worse than
others. Nevertheless it is id'ing on its own without a carrier
It doesn't have to be 'recognizable' (at least I never saw any such
wording in the rules). The key is that it's not IDing on its own - it's
being triggered by a signal on the input.
I use CTCSS on my repeaters (most of them) gated by the COS, so I hear
almost no IDs. Hence, they don't bother
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
At 06:10 AM 04/12/09, you wrote:
I know we're not supposed to discuss FCC rules on this forum, so I hope this
isn't across the line.
I'm trying to find a Rileygram citing a repeater owner because his repeater
ID'd
...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Morris WA6ILQ
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 6:45 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
At 06:10 AM 04/12/09, you wrote:
I know were not supposed to discuss FCC rules
on this forum, so I hope this isn
,
Mike
WM4B
_
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mike Morris WA6ILQ
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 10:26 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
, 2009 10:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
Is this it ?
https://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2002/09/18/100/?nc=1
Mike WA6ILQ
At 05:10 PM 04/12/09, you wrote:
If my O-O Coordinator can't lay his hands on it, I might do that. I
specifically
At 4/12/2009 15:04, you wrote:
Yet Amateur Radio repeaters can legally transmit 24/7/365 (literally)
and would then be required to put out and ID every 10 minutes...
...so long as they're retransmitting the communications of other amateur
stations. Some busy IRLP reflectors Echolink conference
)
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 10:31 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
Nope. I saw that one too and it piqued my interest, but the
one I'm thinking of was just a simple violation of the 'speak
when spoken to' philosophy. just
Bob, actually I believe the change was prompted by the NASA space shuttle
rebroadcasts.
73,
Paul, AE4KR
- Original Message -
From: n...@no6b.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2009 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater ID Enforcement
Didn't something come out a few years ago where the FCC relaxed those rules
and a repeater can now ID every 10 mins without activity?
-- Original Message --
Received: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:42:38 PM PDT
From: n...@no6b.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder
24 matches
Mail list logo
